IMS Health HEOR, Brussels, Belgium.
J Med Econ. 2013;16(5):596-605. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.773333. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
The cost effectiveness of pregabalin as an add-on to the standard treatment of Belgian patients with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) had been demonstrated in a previously published Markov model. The purpose of this study was to update that model with more recent cost data and clinical evidence, and reevaluate the cost effectiveness from the payer's perspective of add-on pregabalin in a wider set of NeP conditions.
The model, featuring 4-week cycles and a 1-year time horizon, consisted in four possible health states: mild, moderate or severe pain and withdrawn from therapy. Three versions of the model were developed, using transition probabilities derived from pain scores reported in three placebo-controlled studies. The two treatment arms were 'usual care' or 'usual care + pregabalin'. Resource use and utility data were obtained from a chart review and unit costs from recent published data. The final outcome of the model was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained when adding pregabalin to standard care.
Based on 1000 simulations, two versions of the model showed that pregabalin was dominant respectively in 94.8% and 67.2% of the simulations, while the incremental cost per QALY was below €32,000/QALY in respectively 99.1% and 94.6% of the simulations. The third version did not show cost effectiveness, despite an incremental cost of only €300 after 1 year. However, in the corresponding study, patients seemed less responsive to GABA analogs, since 55% of them had failed to respond to gabapentin before study inclusion.
The studies upon which the model is based have a short follow-up time as compared to the model horizon. The endpoints of two studies were only provided at the aggregated level and do not necessarily reflect the real practice.
Based on this analysis, it can be concluded that from a Belgium payer perspective pregabalin offers a slight increase in quality of life in the studied populations as compared to standard care. Pregabalin is cost effective in the majority of cases except in one published clinical study, despite a low incremental cost per year (€300).
普瑞巴林作为比利时带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)患者标准治疗的附加药物,其成本效益已在先前发表的 Markov 模型中得到证实。本研究的目的是使用更近期的成本数据和临床证据更新该模型,并从支付者的角度重新评估在更广泛的神经病理性疼痛(NeP)条件下添加普瑞巴林的成本效益。
该模型采用 4 周周期和 1 年时间范围,包含 4 种可能的健康状态:轻度、中度或重度疼痛和退出治疗。该模型开发了三个版本,使用来自三项安慰剂对照研究中疼痛评分报告的转移概率。两个治疗臂分别为“常规护理”或“常规护理+普瑞巴林”。资源利用和效用数据来自图表审查,单位成本来自最近发表的数据。模型的最终结果是当将普瑞巴林添加到标准护理中时,每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。
基于 1000 次模拟,该模型的两个版本分别显示普瑞巴林在 94.8%和 67.2%的模拟中占主导地位,而每获得一个 QALY 的增量成本分别低于 32000 欧元/QALY 和 30000 欧元/QALY。在 99.1%和 94.6%的模拟中,第三个版本也没有显示出成本效益,尽管 1 年后的增量成本仅为 300 欧元。然而,在相应的研究中,由于 55%的患者在研究纳入前对 GABA 类似物没有反应,因此患者对 GABA 类似物的反应似乎较差。
该模型所依据的研究与模型期限相比随访时间较短。两项研究的终点仅在汇总水平上提供,不一定反映实际情况。
根据这项分析,可以得出结论,从比利时支付者的角度来看,与标准护理相比,普瑞巴林在研究人群中略微提高了生活质量。普瑞巴林在大多数情况下具有成本效益,除了在一项已发表的临床研究中,尽管每年的增量成本较低(300 欧元)。