Ferster D
Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Vis Neurosci. 1990 Feb;4(2):135-45. doi: 10.1017/s0952523800002297.
X- and Y-mediated input to areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex was studied using current-source-density analysis of field potentials evoked by stimulation of the optic nerves. A cuff-shaped electrode was used for stimulation so that Y axons, by virtue of their larger diameters, would have lower electrical thresholds than X axons. The effect in each cortical area of activating Y axons alone could therefore be determined by low-amplitude stimulation of the optic nerves. Current-source densities were calculated by two separate methods. (1) In five experiments, field potentials were measured sequentially at different cortical depths with a single tungsten electrode. Current densities were then calculated by computer. (2) In two experiments, current densities were derived in real time from field potentials recorded simultaneously from three sites with a multi-electrode probe. The calculation was performed by an analog circuit specially designed for this purpose. This method has several advantages over the standard, single-electrode method. At stimulus strengths sufficient to activate the majority of Y axons in the optic nerves, but subthreshold to most X axons, the field potentials evoked in area 17 changed little from layer to layer. When the current-source-density analysis was applied to these potentials, no significant sources or sinks were detectable. Only when the stimulus strength was raised to the point that both X and Y axons were activated by the stimulus were any current sources or sinks detected in area 17. The currents were similar in time course and laminar pattern to those recorded after stimulation of the optic chiasm. In area 18, large sources and sinks were evoked by stimulation of Y axons alone. These currents changed little when the stimulus strength was increased to activate X axons as well. Area 18, therefore, in contrast to area 17, seems to be dominated by Y input and receives little X input. These results support the conclusions of the accompanying paper in which synaptic potentials were recorded intracellularly from cortical neutrons. The intracellular experiments failed to show substantial Y input to area 17. The projections of X and Y axons may therefore be much more highly segregated into areas 17 and 18 than previously thought. Alternatively, the nature of the Y input to area 17 may be very different from that to area 18 in that it cannot be easily detected with intracellular or current-source-density techniques.
利用对视神经刺激所诱发的场电位进行电流源密度分析,研究了X和Y介导的输入到猫视觉皮层17区和18区的情况。使用袖带形电极进行刺激,这样Y轴突由于直径较大,其电阈值会比X轴突低。因此,仅通过对视神经进行低幅度刺激就可以确定在每个皮层区域单独激活Y轴突的效果。电流源密度通过两种不同的方法计算。(1)在五个实验中,用单个钨电极在不同皮层深度依次测量场电位。然后通过计算机计算电流密度。(2)在两个实验中,电流密度是通过用多电极探头同时从三个部位记录的场电位实时推导出来的。计算由专门为此设计的模拟电路进行。这种方法比标准的单电极方法有几个优点。在刺激强度足以激活视神经中的大多数Y轴突,但对大多数X轴突来说低于阈值时,17区诱发的场电位在各层之间变化很小。当对这些电位应用电流源密度分析时,没有检测到明显的电流源或电流汇。只有当刺激强度提高到X和Y轴突都被刺激激活的程度时,才在17区检测到任何电流源或电流汇。这些电流在时间进程和层状模式上与刺激视交叉后记录的电流相似。在18区,仅刺激Y轴突就诱发了大的电流源和电流汇。当刺激强度增加到也激活X轴突时,这些电流变化很小。因此,与17区相比,18区似乎主要由Y输入主导,几乎没有X输入。这些结果支持了随附论文的结论,在该论文中从皮层神经元细胞内记录了突触电位。细胞内实验未能显示有大量Y输入到17区。因此,X和Y轴突的投射可能比以前认为的在17区和18区之间的分隔程度更高。或者,输入到17区的Y的性质可能与输入到18区的Y非常不同,因为用细胞内或电流源密度技术不容易检测到它。