• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入院时的高血糖水平表明接受介入治疗的心肌梗死患者预后不良的程度如何?

What level of hyperglycaemia on admission indicates a poor prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction treated invasively?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Medical University in Bialystok, ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24A, Białystok, Poland.

出版信息

Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(6):564-72.

PMID:22718372
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stress hyperglycaemia on admission is a predictor of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).

AIM

To establish what level of hyperglycaemia on admission indicates a significantly poorer long-term prognosis in patients with MI treated invasively.

METHODS

Glycaemia on admission was measured in patients with both ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST- -segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In-hospital and late mortality were evaluated during a 679.3 ± 202 day follow-up.

RESULTS

We enrolled 794 patients (564 men; 71%), mean age 63.8 ± 11.3 years. One per cent of the patients died during initial hospitalisation, and 10% during the two-year follow-up. The mean value of glycaemia in the whole population was 115 ± 36 mg/dL (6.32 ± 1.98 mmol/L). Admission glycaemia in patients who died in hospital was 194 ± 71 mg/dL (10.67 ± 3.91 mmol/L), while in the patients discharged home it was 114 ± 35 mg/dL (6.27 ± 1.93 mmol/L) (p 〈 0.0001). In terms of two-year mortality, the patients who died had also significantly higher glycaemia on admission (145 ± 48 mg/dL; 7.98 ± 2.64 mmol/L) vs 112 ± 31 mg/dL (6.16 ± 1.71 mmol/L, p 〈 0.0001). Apart from admission hyperglycaemia, we found the following risk factors of late mortality in univariate analysis: age, heart rate (HR), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), creatinine level, number of significantly narrowed coronary vessels other than the infarct related artery (IRA), and unsuccessful PCI. In multivariate analysis, the following parameters correlated with death in the two-year follow-up: glycaemia on admission, age, HR, LVEF, GFR, creatinine level, total cholesterol, number of significantly narrowed coronary vessels other than the IRA, and unsuccessful PCI. Hyperglycaemia on admission was an independent risk factor of death even after adjustment for confounding variables such as age, sex and LVEF. We compared the areas under ROC curve for in-hospital mortality and the areas under ROC curve for late mortality according to glycaemia on admission. Both were significantly different from those of a random model (p 〈 0.001 and p 〈 0.001, respectively). A glycaemia value of 205 mg/dL (11.28 mmol/L) calculated from ROC curve had the highest sensitivity and specificity for late mortality. Apart from these findings, we observed a linear correlation between glycaemia and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The best cut-off value for stress hyperglycaemia determined by ROC curve in patients with acute MI treated invasively is 205 mg/dL (11.28 mmol/L). Patients with glucose levels 〉 205 mg/dL (11.28 mmol/L) on admission have significantly higher late mortality compared to those with glucose levels 〈 205 mg/dL (11.28 mmol/L). Our results suggest that hyperglycaemia is a reliable marker of poor outcome in acute MI patients with and without previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus. This level of glucose may be used in risk stratification in patients with acute MI.

摘要

背景

入院时的应激性高血糖是急性心肌梗死(MI)患者死亡的预测指标。

目的

确定在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 MI 患者中,入院时的何种程度的高血糖表明预后明显较差。

方法

测量接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者入院时的血糖水平。在 679.3 ± 202 天的随访期间评估院内和晚期死亡率。

结果

我们共纳入 794 例患者(564 例男性;71%),平均年龄为 63.8 ± 11.3 岁。1%的患者在住院期间死亡,10%的患者在两年随访期间死亡。整个人群的血糖平均值为 115 ± 36 mg/dL(6.32 ± 1.98 mmol/L)。住院期间死亡患者的入院血糖为 194 ± 71 mg/dL(10.67 ± 3.91 mmol/L),而出院回家的患者为 114 ± 35 mg/dL(6.27 ± 1.93 mmol/L)(p 〈 0.0001)。就两年死亡率而言,死亡患者的入院血糖也明显更高(145 ± 48 mg/dL;7.98 ± 2.64 mmol/L)与 112 ± 31 mg/dL(6.16 ± 1.71 mmol/L,p 〈 0.0001)。除入院高血糖外,我们还发现单因素分析中晚期死亡率的以下危险因素:年龄、心率(HR)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、肾小球滤过率(GFR)、肌酐水平、梗死相关动脉(IRA)以外狭窄程度显著的冠状动脉数量以及 PCI 不成功。在多因素分析中,以下参数与两年随访期间的死亡相关:入院时的血糖、年龄、HR、LVEF、GFR、肌酐水平、总胆固醇、IRA 以外狭窄程度显著的冠状动脉数量以及 PCI 不成功。入院时的高血糖即使在调整年龄、性别和 LVEF 等混杂因素后,也是死亡的独立危险因素。我们根据入院时的血糖比较了住院死亡率和晚期死亡率的 ROC 曲线下面积。两者均明显不同于随机模型(p 〈 0.001 和 p 〈 0.001)。根据 ROC 曲线计算的 205 mg/dL(11.28 mmol/L)的血糖值对于晚期死亡率具有最高的敏感性和特异性。除了这些发现,我们还观察到血糖与死亡率之间存在线性相关性。

结论

在接受侵袭性治疗的急性 MI 患者中,ROC 曲线确定的应激性高血糖最佳截断值为 205 mg/dL(11.28 mmol/L)。入院时血糖水平〉205 mg/dL(11.28 mmol/L)的患者与血糖水平〈205 mg/dL(11.28 mmol/L)的患者相比,晚期死亡率明显更高。我们的结果表明,高血糖是伴有或不伴有先前诊断为糖尿病的急性 MI 患者预后不良的可靠标志物。该血糖水平可用于急性 MI 患者的风险分层。

相似文献

1
What level of hyperglycaemia on admission indicates a poor prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction treated invasively?入院时的高血糖水平表明接受介入治疗的心肌梗死患者预后不良的程度如何?
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(6):564-72.
2
Blood glucose level on admission determines in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.入院时的血糖水平可预测行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的院内和长期死亡率。
Kardiol Pol. 2010 Jul;68(7):743-51.
3
Relationship between blood glucose on admission and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者入院时血糖水平与预后的关系
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Sep;65(9):1031-8; discussion 1039-40.
4
Acute hyperglycaemia and inflammation in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.急性高血糖症与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的炎症反应。
Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(3):260-7. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0038.
5
Predictive value of plasma glucose level on admission for short and long term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.入院时血浆葡萄糖水平对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者短期和长期死亡率的预测价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 1;109(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.067. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
6
Elevated admission serum creatinine predicts poor myocardial blood flow and one-year mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.入院时血清肌酐升高可预测接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者心肌血流不佳及一年死亡率。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Oct;21(10):493-8.
7
Does glucose level at hospital discharge predict one-year mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?出院时的血糖水平能否预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死糖尿病患者的一年死亡率?
Kardiol Pol. 2008 Jan;66(1):1-8; discussion 9-11.
8
In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, admission glucose level is a strong independent predictor for 1-year mortality in patients without a prior diagnosis of diabetes.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中,入院血糖水平是既往无糖尿病诊断患者1年死亡率的强有力独立预测因素。
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
9
The effects of acute hyperglycaemia on the in-hospital and long-term prognosis in patients with an acute coronary syndrome--a pilot study.急性高血糖症对急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间和长期预后的影响——一项初步研究。
Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(8):774-81.
10
Cardiovascular mortality and heart failure risk score for patients after ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (Data from the Leiden MISSION! Infarct Registry).ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死后行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的心血管死亡率和心力衰竭风险评分(来自莱顿 MISSION!梗死登记研究的数据)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 15;109(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.029.

引用本文的文献

1
Significant narrowing of the circumflex artery leads to worse outcomes than right coronary artery narrowing in patients with anterior myocardial infarction treated invasively.在接受侵入性治疗的前壁心肌梗死患者中,回旋支动脉的显著狭窄比右冠状动脉狭窄导致更差的预后。
Neth Heart J. 2015 May;23(5):258-62. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0678-5.