• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奶农使用价格风险管理工具。

Dairy farmer use of price risk management tools.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4176-83. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5219.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2011-5219
PMID:22720973
Abstract

Volatility in milk and feed prices can adversely affect dairy farm profitability. Many risk management tools are available for use by US dairy farmers. This research uses surveys of Michigan dairy farmers to examine the extent to which price risk management tools have been used, the farm and operator characteristics that explain the use of these tools, and reasons farmers have not used these tools. A 1999 survey was used to benchmark the degree to which dairy producers had used milk and feed price risk management instruments to compare with 2011 use rates. The surveys collected information about the farm characteristics such as herd size, farmland operated, business organization, and solvency position. Farm operator characteristics collected include age, education, and experience. Dairy farmer use of both milk and feed price risk management tools increased between 1999 and 2011. In 2011, herd size was positively related to the use of milk price risk management tools, whereas farms organized as a sole proprietorship were less likely to use them. Also in 2011, herd size and land operated were positively related to feed price risk management tools, whereas operator age was negatively related. Reasons why farmers had not used price risk management tools included basis risk, cost, lack of management time, cooperative membership, and lack of understanding. Conclusions include the need for educational programming on price risk management tools and a broader exploration of dairy farm risk management programs.

摘要

牛奶和饲料价格的波动会对奶农的盈利能力产生不利影响。美国奶农有许多风险管理工具可供使用。本研究通过对密歇根州奶农的调查,考察了价格风险管理工具的使用程度、解释这些工具使用的农场和经营者特征,以及农民未使用这些工具的原因。1999 年的一项调查被用来衡量奶农使用牛奶和饲料价格风险管理工具的程度,以便与 2011 年的使用率进行比较。调查收集了有关农场特征的信息,如畜群规模、经营的农田、企业组织和偿债能力状况。收集的农场经营者特征包括年龄、教育程度和经验。1999 年至 2011 年间,奶农对牛奶和饲料价格风险管理工具的使用都有所增加。2011 年,畜群规模与牛奶价格风险管理工具的使用呈正相关,而独资经营的农场则不太可能使用这些工具。同样在 2011 年,畜群规模和土地经营与饲料价格风险管理工具呈正相关,而经营者年龄则呈负相关。农民未使用价格风险管理工具的原因包括基差风险、成本、缺乏管理时间、合作社成员资格和缺乏了解。结论包括需要对价格风险管理工具进行教育规划,并更广泛地探索奶牛场风险管理计划。

相似文献

1
Dairy farmer use of price risk management tools.奶农使用价格风险管理工具。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4176-83. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5219.
2
Identifying cost-minimizing strategies for guaranteeing target dairy income over feed cost via use of the Livestock Gross Margin dairy insurance program.通过使用牲畜总利润奶制品保险计划,确定保障目标奶制品收入超过饲料成本的成本最小化策略。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jul;93(7):3350-7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2815.
3
Mean-reversion in income over feed cost margins: evidence and implications for managing margin risk by US dairy producers.收入与饲料成本利润率的均值回复:对美国奶农管理利润率风险的证据与启示。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Dec;95(12):7417-28. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5818. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
4
Effects of stored feed cropping systems and farm size on the profitability of Maine organic dairy farm simulations.存储饲料种植系统和农场规模对缅因州有机奶牛场模拟盈利能力的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Nov;94(11):5710-23. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4361.
5
Understanding the milk-to-feed price ratio as a proxy for dairy farm profitability.理解奶料比作为衡量奶牛场盈利能力的指标。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4942-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2998.
6
Comparing risk in conventional and organic dairy farming in the Netherlands: an empirical analysis.比较荷兰常规和有机奶牛养殖的风险:一项实证分析。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):3803-11. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5200.
7
Estimation of risk management effects on revenue and purchased feed costs on US dairy farms.美国奶牛场风险管理对收入和购买饲料成本的影响评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Sep;98(9):6588-96. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8864.
8
Economic and environmental feasibility of a perennial cow dairy farm.多年生奶牛养殖场的经济与环境可行性
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Aug;88(8):3009-19. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72981-7.
9
The effect of price and production risks on optimal farm plans in Swiss dairy production considering 2 different milk quota systems.考虑两种不同牛奶配额制度,研究价格和生产风险对瑞士奶牛养殖最优农场计划的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Apr;96(4):2234-2246. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6086. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
10
Measuring the financial risks of New York dairy producers.衡量纽约奶农的财务风险。
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Feb;84(2):411-20. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74491-8.