University of Helsinki, Department of Public Health, P.O. Box 41, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Oct;75(7):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
Our aim was to find out whether the associations between health and both individual and household economic position reflected a causal effect on health of household affluence and consumption potential. We attempted to separate this effect from health-selection effects, in other words the potential effect of health on economic position, and from various effects related to occupational position and prestige that might correlate with the economic indicators. We made a distinction between individual labour-market advantage and household economic resources in order to reflect these theoretical definitions. Our aim was to test and compare two hypotheses: 1) low household economic resources lead to an increase in health problems later on, and 2) health problems are disadvantageous on the labour market, and consequently decrease the level of economic resources. We used prospective register data obtained from the databases of Statistics Finland and constituting an 11-per-cent random sample of the Finnish population in 1993-2006. Health problems were measured in terms of sickness allowance paid by the Finnish Social Insurance Institution, household economic resources in terms of household-equivalent disposable income and taxable wealth, and labour-market advantage in terms of individual taxable income and months of unemployment. We used structural equation models (n = 211,639) to examine the hypothesised causal pathways. Low household economic resources predicted future health problems, and health problems predicted future deterioration in labour-market advantage. The effect of economic resources on health problems was somewhat stronger. These results suggest that accumulated exposure to low economic resources leads to increasing health problems, and that this causal mechanism is a more significant source of persistent health inequalities than health problems that bring about a permanent decrease in economic resources.
我们的目的是找出健康与个人和家庭经济地位之间的关联是否反映了家庭富裕和消费潜力对健康的因果影响。我们试图将这种影响与健康选择效应(即健康对经济地位的潜在影响)以及与经济指标相关的可能与职业地位和声望相关的各种效应区分开来。我们区分了个人劳动力市场优势和家庭经济资源,以反映这些理论定义。我们的目的是检验和比较两个假设:1)低家庭经济资源会导致以后健康问题的增加,2)健康问题在劳动力市场上处于不利地位,从而降低经济资源水平。我们使用了前瞻性登记数据,这些数据来自芬兰统计局的数据库,构成了 1993-2006 年芬兰人口的 11%随机样本。健康问题是根据芬兰社会保险机构支付的病假津贴来衡量的,家庭经济资源是根据家庭等效可支配收入和应纳税财富来衡量的,劳动力市场优势是根据个人应纳税收入和失业月数来衡量的。我们使用结构方程模型(n=211639)来检验假设的因果途径。低家庭经济资源预测未来的健康问题,而健康问题预测未来劳动力市场优势的恶化。经济资源对健康问题的影响略强。这些结果表明,长期接触低经济资源会导致健康问题增加,而这种因果机制是造成持续健康不平等的一个更重要的来源,而不是健康问题导致经济资源永久减少。