University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Mass Spectrometric Proteomics, Campus Forschung, N27 Room 00.08, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2012 Jul 15;901:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.05.037. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
Liquid chromatography is often the method of choice for the analysis of proteins in their native state. Nevertheless compared to two-dimensional electrophoresis, the resolution of common chromatographic techniques is low. Liquid chromatography in the displacement mode has previously been shown to offer higher resolution and to elute proteins in the high concentrations. In this study we compared to what extend displacement mode was a suitable alternative to gradient mode for the separation of a complex protein mixture using anion-exchange displacement chromatography and if it is therefore helpful for proteomic investigations. Hence we analyzed the qualitative protein composition of each fraction by tryptic digestion of the proteins, analysis of the tryptic peptides by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry followed by data base analysis and by measuring the elution profiles of 22 selected proteins with selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. In the fractions of displacement mode a significantly higher number of identified proteins (51 versus 16) was yielded in comparison to gradient mode. The resolution of displacement chromatography was slightly lower than of gradient chromatography for many but not for all proteins. The selectivities of displacement mode and gradient mode are very different. In conclusion displacement chromatography is a well suited alternative for top-down proteomic approaches which start with separating intact proteins first prior to mass spectrometric analysis of intact or digested proteins. The significant orthogonality of both modes may be used in the future for combining them in multidimensional fractionation procedures.
液相色谱法通常是分析天然状态下蛋白质的首选方法。然而,与二维电泳相比,常见色谱技术的分辨率较低。先前已经表明,置换模式的液相色谱法具有更高的分辨率,并能在高浓度下洗脱蛋白质。在这项研究中,我们比较了置换模式在多大程度上可以替代梯度模式用于复杂蛋白质混合物的分离,以及它是否有助于蛋白质组学研究。因此,我们通过胰蛋白酶消化蛋白质来分析每个馏分的定性蛋白质组成,通过液相色谱-质谱联用分析胰蛋白酶肽,然后进行数据库分析,并通过选择反应监测质谱法测量 22 种选定蛋白质的洗脱曲线。与梯度模式相比,置换模式的馏分中鉴定出的蛋白质数量(51 个与 16 个)显著增加。对于许多蛋白质,但不是所有蛋白质,置换色谱的分辨率略低于梯度色谱。置换模式和梯度模式的选择性非常不同。总之,置换色谱是一种非常适合的替代方法,适用于自上而下的蛋白质组学方法,该方法首先分离完整的蛋白质,然后再对完整或消化的蛋白质进行质谱分析。两种模式的显著正交性可用于将来将它们组合在多维分级分离程序中。