Neurosciences Critical Care Division, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2677-84. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182591ff1.
To characterize associations between antiepileptic drugs with sedating or anesthetic effects (third-line antiepileptic drugs) vs. other antiepileptic agents, and short-term outcomes, in status epilepticus. Furthermore, to evaluate the role of adverse hemodynamic and respiratory effects of these agents in status epilepticus treatment.
Retrospective comparative analysis.
Tertiary academic medical center with two emergency departments and two neurologic intensive care units.
Adults admitted with a diagnosis of status epilepticus defined as seizures lasting continuously >5 mins, or for discrete periods in succession.
None.
Of 126 patients with 144 separate status epilepticus admissions, 57 were female (45%) with mean age 54.7 ± 15.7 yrs. Status epilepticus was convulsive in 132 cases (92%). Status epilepticus etiologies included subtherapeutic antiepileptic drugs (43%), alcohol or other nonantiepileptic drug (13%), and acute central nervous system disease (12%). Third-line antiepileptic drugs were administered in 47 cases (33%). Seventy-eight status epilepticus episodes (54%) had good outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Score = 1, 2) at the time of hospital discharge. On univariate analysis, poor outcome (Glasgow Outcome Score > 2) was associated with older age (mean 59.8 ± 15.5 vs. 50.5 ± 13.8 yrs, p < .001), acute central nervous system disease (21% vs. 4%, p = .001), mechanical ventilation (76% vs. 53%, p = .004), longer duration of ventilation (median 10 days [range 1-56] vs. 2 days [range 1-10], p < .001), treatment with vasopressors (35% vs. 5%, p < .001), and treatment with third-line antiepileptic drugs (51% vs. 17%, p < .001). Death was associated with acute central nervous system disease, prolonged ventilation, treatment with vasopressors, and treatment with third-line antiepileptic drugs. Predictors of poor outcome among all status epilepticus episodes were older age (odds ratio 1.06; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.09; p < .001), treatment with third-line antiepileptic therapy (odds ratio 5.64; 95% confidence interval 2.31-13.75; p < .001), and first episode of status epilepticus (odds ratio 3.73; 95% confidence interval 1.38-10.10; p = .010). Among status epilepticus episodes treated by third-line antiepileptic drugs, predictors of poor outcome were older age (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.18; p = .038) and longer ventilation (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.00; p = .015). Predictors of mortality among all status epilepticus episodes were treatment with third-line antiepileptic drugs (odds ratio, 12.08; 95% confidence interval 2.30-63.39; p = .003) and older age (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.12; p = .045).
Third-line antiepileptic drug therapies with sedating or anesthetic effects predicted poor outcome and death in status epilepticus. Hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy and duration of mechanical ventilation induced by these agents may be contributing factors, especially when pentobarbital is used. These findings may inform decision making on drug therapy in status epilepticus and help develop safer and more effective treatment strategies to improve outcome.
描述具有镇静或麻醉作用的抗癫痫药物(三线抗癫痫药物)与其他抗癫痫药物相比,与癫痫持续状态的短期结局之间的关联。此外,评估这些药物的不良反应对癫痫持续状态治疗的血流动力学和呼吸作用的影响。
回顾性比较分析。
设有两个急诊部门和两个神经重症监护病房的三级学术医疗中心。
诊断为癫痫持续状态的成年人,定义为持续发作超过 5 分钟或连续离散发作。
无。
在 126 例 144 例单独癫痫持续状态入院患者中,57 例为女性(45%),平均年龄为 54.7 ± 15.7 岁。132 例癫痫持续状态为惊厥性(92%)。癫痫持续状态的病因包括治疗剂量不足的抗癫痫药物(43%)、酒精或其他非抗癫痫药物(13%)和急性中枢神经系统疾病(12%)。在 47 例患者中使用了三线抗癫痫药物(33%)。在出院时,78 例癫痫持续状态发作(54%)有良好的结局(格拉斯哥结局评分=1、2)。在单变量分析中,不良结局(格拉斯哥结局评分>2)与年龄较大(平均 59.8 ± 15.5 岁 vs. 50.5 ± 13.8 岁,p<0.001)、急性中枢神经系统疾病(21% vs. 4%,p=0.001)、机械通气(76% vs. 53%,p=0.004)、通气时间延长(中位数 10 天[范围 1-56] vs. 2 天[范围 1-10],p<0.001)、使用血管加压素治疗(35% vs. 5%,p<0.001)和使用三线抗癫痫药物治疗(51% vs. 17%,p<0.001)有关。死亡与急性中枢神经系统疾病、通气时间延长、血管加压素治疗和三线抗癫痫药物治疗有关。所有癫痫持续状态发作不良结局的预测因素为年龄较大(优势比 1.06;95%置信区间 1.03-1.09;p<0.001)、使用三线抗癫痫药物治疗(优势比 5.64;95%置信区间 2.31-13.75;p<0.001)和首次癫痫持续状态发作(优势比 3.73;95%置信区间 1.38-10.10;p=0.010)。在接受三线抗癫痫药物治疗的癫痫持续状态发作中,不良结局的预测因素为年龄较大(优势比,1.09;95%置信区间 1.01-1.18;p=0.038)和通气时间延长(优势比,1.47;95%置信区间 1.08-2.00;p=0.015)。所有癫痫持续状态发作死亡的预测因素为三线抗癫痫药物治疗(优势比,12.08;95%置信区间 2.30-63.39;p=0.003)和年龄较大(优势比,1.06;95%置信区间 1.00-1.12;p=0.045)。
具有镇静或麻醉作用的三线抗癫痫药物治疗与癫痫持续状态的不良结局和死亡相关。这些药物引起的低血压需要血管加压素治疗和机械通气时间延长可能是相关因素,尤其是使用戊巴比妥时。这些发现可能为癫痫持续状态的药物治疗决策提供信息,并有助于制定更安全、更有效的治疗策略,以改善结局。