Basulto Marset J, Casas-Agustench P, Babio N, Salas-Salvadó J
Human Nutrition Unit, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV. Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Barcelona, Spain.
Nutr Hosp. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):632-44. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112012000200042.
Little research has been conducted into the attitudes and knowledge of dietitians-nutritionists (DN) or of experts in human nutrition and dietetics (EHND) regarding functional foods (FFs).
To evaluate the knowledge of, interest in and predisposition towards FFs in Spanish DN and EHND, and how these professionals rate the potential benefits and risks associated with consuming FFs.
2100 DN and 122 EHND were asked to participate in a self-administered questionnaire. The results were expressed using percentages and the DN responses were compared with those of the EHND by means of chi-squared test. A significant difference was regarded as having been obtained if P < 0.05.
204 DN and 112 EHND responded. After eliminating 45 surveys due to anomalies, 268 surveys were analyzed (170 from the DN, 8.1% participation; 98 from the EHND, 80.3% participation). No statistically significant differences were observed between the responses of the DN and the EHND except in: 1) the view that it was "dangerous" to consume certain FFs ≥ 4 times a day; and 2) the knowledge of the population regarding in which situations certain FFs should be consumed. Most of the professionals demonstrated good knowledge of FFs, consumed FFs, showed a positive attitude towards FFs and thought that the information provided to the consumer is insufficient.
FFs are generally accepted by nutritional professionals. However, further study is required into the discrepancies between DN and EHND regarding the view that it is "dangerous" to consume certain FFs and regarding their evaluation of whether the public know in which situations certain FFs should be consumed.
关于营养师 - 营养学家(DN)或人类营养与饮食学专家(EHND)对功能性食品(FFs)的态度和知识的研究很少。
评估西班牙DN和EHND对FFs的知识、兴趣和倾向,以及这些专业人员如何评价与食用FFs相关的潜在益处和风险。
邀请2100名DN和122名EHND参与一份自填式问卷。结果以百分比表示,通过卡方检验将DN的回答与EHND的回答进行比较。如果P < 0.05,则认为获得了显著差异。
204名DN和112名EHND做出了回应。由于异常情况剔除45份调查问卷后,分析了268份调查问卷(170份来自DN,参与率8.1%;98份来自EHND,参与率80.3%)。除了以下方面,DN和EHND的回答之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异:1)认为每天食用某些FFs≥4次是“危险的”这一观点;2)公众对某些FFs应在何种情况下食用的了解。大多数专业人员对FFs有良好的了解,食用FFs,对FFs持积极态度,并认为向消费者提供的信息不足。
FFs通常被营养专业人员接受。然而,关于某些FFs“危险”的观点以及他们对公众是否知道某些FFs应在何种情况下食用的评估,DN和EHND之间的差异需要进一步研究。