• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期精神科患者是否会导致精神卫生保健中非办公时间的危机咨询增加?

Are long-term psychiatric patients causing more crisis consultations outside office hours in mental health care?

机构信息

Arkin Institute for Mental Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;59(6):555-60. doi: 10.1177/0020764012445259. Epub 2012 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1177/0020764012445259
PMID:22733002
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As well as an improvement in community services, the de-institutionalization of patients receiving long-term psychiatric care can lead to marginally staffed mental health services, more homelessness, rising admission rates and more people in prison cells. It is assumed that an imbalance between community and hospital care for chronic patients puts pressure on crisis services.

AIMS

In this study, the central question is whether patients receiving long-term psychiatric care in Amsterdam do indeed put pressure on the city's emergency mental health services. We compare the pressure exerted by this group with the pressure resulting from the use of these services by all registered patients.

METHODS

Data were taken from the client registration systems of three mental health organizations in Amsterdam in the period from 2000 to 2004. Inclusion criteria for long-term psychiatric patients were age above 19 years and uninterrupted receipt of mental health care for a minimum of two successive years.

RESULTS

Annually, 6%-8% of all non-long-term patients experienced a crisis outside office hours in the period under investigation; this was 4%-6% for long-term patients. The non-long-term patients accounted for 83% of crisis contacts outside office hours over the entire study period, with long-term patients accounting for 17%.

CONCLUSIONS

The assumption that crises are more prevalent in long-term patients in the community seems to be an example of stigmatization rather than an observation based on fact.

摘要

背景

除了社区服务的改善,长期接受精神科护理的患者的去机构化可能导致精神卫生服务人员配备不足、更多的无家可归者、入院率上升和更多的人被关进监狱牢房。人们认为,慢性患者的社区和医院护理之间的不平衡给危机服务带来了压力。

目的

在这项研究中,核心问题是阿姆斯特丹接受长期精神科护理的患者是否确实给该市的紧急精神卫生服务带来了压力。我们将这一组患者所施加的压力与所有登记患者使用这些服务所产生的压力进行了比较。

方法

数据取自阿姆斯特丹三家精神卫生组织的客户登记系统,时间跨度为 2000 年至 2004 年。长期精神科患者的纳入标准为年龄在 19 岁以上,并且连续至少两年不间断地接受精神卫生护理。

结果

在所调查的时期内,每年有 6%-8%的非长期患者在办公时间之外经历过危机;长期患者的比例为 4%-6%。在整个研究期间,非长期患者占非办公时间危机接触的 83%,而长期患者占 17%。

结论

社区中长期患者更易发生危机的假设似乎是一种污名化的例子,而不是基于事实的观察。

相似文献

1
Are long-term psychiatric patients causing more crisis consultations outside office hours in mental health care?长期精神科患者是否会导致精神卫生保健中非办公时间的危机咨询增加?
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;59(6):555-60. doi: 10.1177/0020764012445259. Epub 2012 Jun 24.
2
[Value of a consultation center and crisis intervention in addressing psychiatric disorders in the perinatal period].[咨询中心及危机干预在解决围产期精神障碍问题中的价值]
Encephale. 2002 Jan-Feb;28(1):71-6.
3
Admission decisions following contact with an emergency mental health assessment and intervention service.在与紧急心理健康评估和干预服务机构接触后做出的入院决定。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1313-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01302.x.
4
[Changes in crisis intervention and emergency psychiatry, Amsterdam emergency consultations in 1983 and 2005].[危机干预与急诊精神病学的变化,1983年和2005年阿姆斯特丹的急诊会诊]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009;51(3):139-50.
5
Community emergency psychiatric service in Israel: a one-year experience.以色列的社区紧急精神科服务:一年的经验
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2009;46(3):207-12.
6
Psychiatric emergency outreach: a report on the first 2 years of functioning in Copenhagen.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56(6):399-405. doi: 10.1080/08039480260389307.
7
[Time-limits on collaboration between the emergency mental health services and the police: a practice-based evaluation in the City of Utrecht, the Netherlands].[紧急心理健康服务与警方合作的时间限制:荷兰乌得勒支市基于实践的评估]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009;51(9):687-92.
8
[Mobile emergency psychiatry in community psychiatry].[社区精神病学中的移动应急精神病学]
Psychiatr Prax. 1990 Nov;17(6):200-5.
9
[Increased referral to psychiatric hospitalization: a challenge for better mental health policies].[精神科住院转诊增加:对改善心理健康政策的一项挑战]
Rev Med Suisse. 2009 Feb 11;5(190):342-4.
10
Psychiatric emergency patients in ambulatory treatment: pattern of referral and compliance.门诊治疗中的精神科急诊患者:转诊模式与依从性
J Ambul Care Manage. 1982 Feb;5(1):55-64. doi: 10.1097/00004479-198202000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Homesick: residential and care patterns in patients with severe mental illness.思乡之情:重症精神疾病患者的居住与护理模式
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1137-6.
2
Pathways through care of severely mentally ill individuals experiencing multiple public crisis events: a qualitative description.经历多重公共危机事件的重症精神病患者的护理途径:定性描述
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 1;16:84. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0787-8.
3
A prediction model for the incidence of civil detention for crisis patients with psychiatric illnesses; the Amsterdam study of acute psychiatry VII.
精神疾病危机患者民事拘留发生率预测模型;阿姆斯特丹急性精神病学研究 VII。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;49(2):283-90. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0742-7. Epub 2013 Jul 18.