Suppr超能文献

联合治疗与单纯化疗作为原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤诱导治疗方案的比较:决策分析。

Combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone as an induction regimen for primary central nervous system lymphoma: a decision analysis.

机构信息

Division of Haematology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2012 Sep;158(5):600-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09208.x. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

Abstract

In immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, combined modality therapy (CMT) using high-dose methotrexate and whole brain radiotherapy has improved response rates compared to chemotherapy alone. The trade-off is delayed and potentially devastating treatment-related neurotoxicity. A Markov decision-analytic model compared CMT to chemotherapy alone in patients with primary CNS lymphoma. Baseline probabilities were derived from a systematic literature review. Outcomes were life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy. Sensitivity analyses were performed. The life expectancy was 2·69 years for CMT and 2·77 years for chemotherapy alone. The quality-adjusted life expectancies for the two strategies were 1·70 and 1·67 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) respectively. In younger patients <60 years of age, CMT yielded a quality-adjusted life expectancy of 2·71 QALYs, compared to 2·09 QALYs for chemotherapy alone, yielding an expected benefit with CMT of 0·62 QALYs or 7·4 quality-adjusted months. There was no difference between the strategies in the older group. The model was robust to key variables for the younger group. The preferred induction strategy for younger patients appears to be CMT, maximizing life expectancy, and QALYs. This analysis confirms that the preferred strategy for older patients is chemotherapy alone.

摘要

在免疫功能正常的原发性中枢神经系统(CNS)淋巴瘤患者中,与单独化疗相比,采用大剂量甲氨蝶呤和全脑放疗的联合治疗模式(CMT)可提高缓解率。但这种方法存在延迟且潜在破坏性的治疗相关神经毒性的风险。一项马克夫决策分析模型将 CMT 与单独化疗用于原发性 CNS 淋巴瘤患者。基线概率来自系统文献回顾。结果是预期寿命和质量调整后的预期寿命。进行了敏感性分析。CMT 的预期寿命为 2.69 年,单独化疗的预期寿命为 2.77 年。两种策略的质量调整预期寿命分别为 1.70 和 1.67 个质量调整生命年(QALY)。在年龄小于 60 岁的年轻患者中,CMT 的质量调整预期寿命为 2.71 QALY,而单独化疗为 2.09 QALY,CMT 预期可带来 0.62 QALY 或 7.4 个质量调整月的获益。在年龄较大的患者中,两种策略之间没有差异。该模型对年轻组的关键变量具有稳健性。对于年轻患者来说,首选的诱导策略似乎是 CMT,可最大限度地提高预期寿命和 QALY。该分析证实,对于年龄较大的患者,首选策略是单独化疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验