• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亨德里奇二世跌倒风险模型在葡萄牙语中的评估与跨文化调适。

Evaluation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model to Portuguese.

作者信息

Caldevilla Ma Nilza, Costa Ma Arminda M, Teles Paulo, Ferreira Pedro M

机构信息

Porto School of Nursing, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):468-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01031.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01031.x
PMID:22734598
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several tools for the assessment of the risk of falling are used commonly by clinical nurses, but none have been validated in Portuguese.

AIMS

To adapt and evaluate the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model (HIIFRM) for use with elderly Portuguese inpatients.

METHOD

We conducted a prospective study of 586 older inpatients in acute care hospitals, from November 2007 to May 2010.

RESULTS

The study involved 270 men and 316 women. The most frequent risk factor on admission and at discharge was a score ≥3 on the 'Get Up and Go' test. The adapted HIIFRM showed a sensitivity of 93.2% and 75.7%, and a specificity of 35% and 46.7%, on admission and at discharge, respectively. A positive predictive value of 17.2% on admission and 17% at discharge and a negative predictive value of 97.3% and 93%, respectively, were estimated.

CONCLUSIONS

The HIIFRM was shown to be a useful tool in predicting falls by patients. Nevertheless, the research model suggested that only four risk factors affected the occurrence of falls significantly on admission and two risk factors at discharge. Further research is required in Portuguese hospital settings.

摘要

背景

临床护士常用几种跌倒风险评估工具,但尚无一种在葡萄牙语环境中得到验证。

目的

对亨德里奇二世跌倒风险模型(HIIFRM)进行改编并评估其在葡萄牙老年住院患者中的应用效果。

方法

2007年11月至2010年5月,我们对急性护理医院的586名老年住院患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。

结果

该研究纳入270名男性和316名女性。入院时和出院时最常见的风险因素是“起立行走”测试得分≥3分。改编后的HIIFRM在入院时和出院时的敏感性分别为93.

相似文献

1
Evaluation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model to Portuguese.亨德里奇二世跌倒风险模型在葡萄牙语中的评估与跨文化调适。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):468-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01031.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
2
Relationship between occurrence of falls and fall-risk scores in an acute care setting using the Hendrich II fall risk model.在急性护理环境中使用亨德里希二世跌倒风险模型时跌倒发生率与跌倒风险评分之间的关系。
Medsurg Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;22(3):180-7.
3
Feasibility and predictive performance of the Hendrich Fall Risk Model II in a rehabilitation department: a prospective study.亨德里奇跌倒风险模型II在康复科的可行性及预测性能:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 11;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2815-x.
4
Evaluation of three fall-risk assessment tools in an acute care setting.在急性护理环境中对三种跌倒风险评估工具的评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Nov;60(4):427-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04419.x.
5
Validation of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model: The imperative to reduce modifiable risk factors.亨德里克二世跌倒风险模型的验证:减少可修正风险因素的必要性。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Jun;53:151243. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151243. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Accidental falls in hospital inpatients: evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of two risk assessment tools.住院患者在医院内意外跌倒:两种风险评估工具的敏感性和特异性评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):690-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05231.x.
7
Evaluation of fall risk assessment tools for psychiatric patient fall prevention: a comparative study.用于预防精神科患者跌倒的跌倒风险评估工具的评价:一项比较研究。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2014 Dec 1;52(12):30-5. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20141022-01. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
8
Predicting falls using two instruments (the Hendrich Fall Risk Model and the Morse Fall Scale) in an acute care setting in Lebanon.在黎巴嫩的一家急症护理机构中,使用两种工具(亨德里奇跌倒风险模型和莫尔斯跌倒量表)预测跌倒情况。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jun;23(11-12):1620-9. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12278. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Fall prediction in inpatients by bedside nurses using the St. Thomas's Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly Inpatients (STRATIFY) instrument: a multicenter study.床边护士使用圣托马斯老年住院患者跌倒风险评估工具(STRATIFY)对住院患者进行跌倒预测:一项多中心研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 May;55(5):725-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01151.x.
10
Testing the Predictive Validity of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model.检验亨德里克二世跌倒风险模型的预测效度。
West J Nurs Res. 2018 Dec;40(12):1785-1799. doi: 10.1177/0193945918766554. Epub 2018 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating the accuracy of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model for hospitalized patients using the ROC curve analysis.利用ROC 曲线分析验证 Hendrich II 跌倒风险模型在住院患者中的准确性。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;40(4):404-412. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12807. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
Testing of Reliability and Validity of the Peninsula Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (PHFRAT) in Acute Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.半岛健康跌倒风险评估工具(PHFRAT)在急性护理中的信效度测试:一项横断面研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Nov 19;14:4685-4696. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S332326. eCollection 2021.
3
Effects of Combined Balance and Strength Training on Measures of Balance and Muscle Strength in Older Women With a History of Falls.
平衡与力量联合训练对有跌倒史老年女性平衡能力及肌肉力量指标的影响
Front Physiol. 2020 Dec 23;11:619016. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.619016. eCollection 2020.
4
Feasibility and predictive performance of the Hendrich Fall Risk Model II in a rehabilitation department: a prospective study.亨德里奇跌倒风险模型II在康复科的可行性及预测性能:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 11;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2815-x.
5
Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model in a Chinese Hospital Population.亨德里希二世跌倒风险模型在中国医院人群中的信效度评估。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):e0142395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142395. eCollection 2015.
6
Type, number or both? A population-based matched case-control study on the risk of fall injuries among older people and number of medications beyond fall-inducing drugs.类型、数量还是两者皆有?一项基于人群的匹配病例对照研究,探讨老年人跌倒受伤风险与除致跌倒药物外的用药数量之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0123390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123390. eCollection 2015.