• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期经皮 SNM 测试不会引起与感染相关的解释。

Prolonged percutaneous SNM testing does not cause infection-related explanation.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):485-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11263.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11263.x
PMID:22738331
Abstract

UNLABELLED

WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective treatment option of different pelvic-related dysfunctions. SNM evaluation by either temporary or permanent electrodes is generally accepted. Extended testing with temporary electrodes has been reported on before but less is known about infection-related risks during prolonged evaluation with definitive electrodes. The present findings show that prolonged testing (mean = 52.3 days) with permanent electrodes does not increase infection-associated explantation rates, although bacterial colonization was found in more than one-third of the patients. Prolonged SNM evaluation under everyday conditions might improve long-term success.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of prolonged stage 1 testing on bacterial electrode colonization, infection and treatment success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all, 21 patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for periods ≥1 month were prospectively evaluated; nine patients had overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), 10 had urinary retention, two had faecal incontinence (FI), and 13 had diabetes and overweight/obesity. After stage 1 testing electrode extension leads were microbiologically analysed to assess bacterial colonization. The primary measurements were pre- and post-SNM treatment comparisons based on patient-agreed criteria using an increased 70% minimum improvement rate; secondary measurements were bacterial colonization and impact of infection.

RESULTS

The mean stage 1 evaluation period was 52.3 days; 16 patients (76%) progressed to stage 2, and five patients were explanted due to inadequate improvement (<70%). There was bacterial colonization in 42.9% of patients and 38.2% of extension leads. Stage 2 patients showed no infection or wound-healing disorders at a mean follow-up of 33.9 months. The success rate for stage 2 implantation treatment was 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few studies in the literature evaluating SNM testing periods vs the risk of clinically relevant implant infection rates. The present study shows that prolonged testing could potentially enhance treatment efficacy without infection-related explantations of the chronic implant, despite the identification of bacteria. SNM-implanted patients with diabetes mellitus or obesity should be followed closely. Clinicians might consider using prolonged testing under everyday conditions. Prolonged SNM stage 1 testing is a very effective minimally invasive treatment option to evaluate pelvic-related dysfunction.

摘要

目的

评估延长 1 期测试对细菌电极定植、感染和治疗成功的影响。

材料和方法

共前瞻性评估 21 例接受骶神经调节(SNM)治疗且治疗时间≥1 个月的患者;9 例患者为膀胱过度活动症(OAB),10 例为尿潴留,2 例为粪便失禁(FI),13 例为糖尿病和超重/肥胖。在 1 期测试后,通过微生物分析延长的电极导联以评估细菌定植。主要测量指标是基于患者同意的标准,采用至少增加 70%的最小改善率,对 SNM 治疗前后进行比较;次要测量指标是细菌定植和感染的影响。

结果

1 期评估的平均时间为 52.3 天;16 例(76%)患者进展至 2 期,5 例患者因改善不足(<70%)而被植入物取出。42.9%的患者和 38.2%的电极导联存在细菌定植。在平均 33.9 个月的随访中,2 期患者无感染或伤口愈合障碍。2 期植入物治疗的成功率为 94%。

结论

文献中很少有研究评估 SNM 测试时间与临床相关植入物感染率风险的关系。本研究表明,尽管发现了细菌,但延长测试可能会提高治疗效果而不会导致慢性植入物发生与感染相关的取出。糖尿病或肥胖的 SNM 植入患者应密切随访。临床医生可能会考虑在日常情况下使用延长测试。延长 1 期 SNM 测试是评估与骨盆相关的功能障碍的一种非常有效的微创治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Prolonged percutaneous SNM testing does not cause infection-related explanation.长期经皮 SNM 测试不会引起与感染相关的解释。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):485-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11263.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
2
Prolonged percutaneous SNM testing does not cause infection-related explanation.
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):368. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11264.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
3
PNE versus 1st stage tined lead procedure: a direct comparison to select the most sensitive test method to identify patients suitable for sacral neuromodulation therapy.经皮神经电刺激(PNE)与 1 期经皮穿刺置管术的比较:选择最敏感的测试方法来识别适合骶神经调节治疗的患者的直接比较。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Sep;30(7):1249-52. doi: 10.1002/nau.20979. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
4
Microbiological tined-lead examination: does prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing induce infection?微生物学锡铅检测:长期骶神经调节测试会引发感染吗?
BJU Int. 2009 Sep;104(5):646-50; discussion 650. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08501.x. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
5
Psychological and psychiatric factors as predictors for success in sacral neuromodulation treatment.心理和精神因素作为预测骶神经调节治疗成功的指标。
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1834-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10205.x. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
6
Sacral neuromodulation in diabetic patients: success and complications in the treatment of voiding dysfunction.糖尿病患者的骶神经调节:治疗排尿功能障碍的成功率和并发症。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Apr;29(4):578-81. doi: 10.1002/nau.20791.
7
Outcomes in a contemporary cohort undergoing sacral neuromodulation using optimized lead placement technique.采用优化的导丝放置技术的当代队列中骶神经调节的结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Aug;38(6):1595-1601. doi: 10.1002/nau.24018. Epub 2019 May 1.
8
Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence?对于大便失禁患者,形态完整的肛门括约肌对骶神经调节成功是否必要?
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Mar;10(3):257-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01375.x. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
9
Sacral neuromodulation in patients with idiopathic overactive bladder after initial botulinum toxin therapy.初始肉毒毒素治疗后特发性逼尿症患者的骶神经调节。
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2148-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
10
Sacral nerve modulation and other treatments in patients with faecal incontinence after unsuccessful pelvic floor rehabilitation: a prospective study.经盆腔底康复治疗失败后粪便失禁患者的骶神经调节和其他治疗:一项前瞻性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Apr;12(4):334-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01792.x. Epub 2009 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence, experience and future prospects.电神经调节在治疗下尿路功能障碍中的应用:证据、经验与未来展望
Ther Adv Urol. 2018 Feb 22;10(5):165-173. doi: 10.1177/1756287218756082. eCollection 2018 May.
2
Sacral Neuromodulation Implant Infection: Risk Factors and Prevention.骶神经调节植入感染:危险因素与预防
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Feb;18(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0663-1.
3
Effects of Appropriate Prolonged Sacral Neuromodulation Testing in Improving Implantation Rate of a Permanent Implantable Pulse Generator in Patients with Refractory Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Mainland China.
中国大陆难治性下尿路功能障碍患者中适当延长骶神经调节测试对提高永久性植入式脉冲发生器植入率的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Feb 20;130(4):439-444. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.199831.
4
Infection Rates of Electrical Leads Used for Percutaneous Neurostimulation of the Peripheral Nervous System.用于周围神经系统经皮神经刺激的电引线的感染率。
Pain Pract. 2017 Jul;17(6):753-762. doi: 10.1111/papr.12523. Epub 2016 Nov 11.