Gelosa L, Borroni G
Institute of Microbiology, University of Milan, Italy.
Microbiologica. 1990 Jul;13(3):257-62.
This study reports the immunological response in subjects vaccinated against rabies. Four serological methods were compared: the immunoenzymatic test with HDCV virus vaccine (EIA-V) and with purified viral glycoprotein (EIA-P), the neutralizing in vitro rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) and the indirect immunofluorescent test (IFI). A concordance of 93.3% was found with RFFIT and EIA-V, 86.8% with RFFIT and EIA-P and 80.5% with RFFIT and IFI. The RFFIT is the most sensitive and specific method for rabies antibodies but more expensive and difficult. IFI recognizes late nucleocapsid antibodies but reports more false positive and negative results. The EIA-V and EIA-P methods are efficient, sensitive, specific and inexpensive for routine use to detect protective titres of antibodies above 0.5 IU/ml fifteen days after the inoculation of HDCV vaccine.
本研究报告了接种狂犬病疫苗的受试者的免疫反应。比较了四种血清学方法:使用人二倍体细胞狂犬病疫苗(HDCV)的免疫酶试验(EIA-V)和使用纯化病毒糖蛋白的免疫酶试验(EIA-P)、体外中和快速荧光灶抑制试验(RFFIT)以及间接免疫荧光试验(IFI)。发现RFFIT与EIA-V的一致性为93.3%,RFFIT与EIA-P的一致性为86.8%,RFFIT与IFI的一致性为80.5%。RFFIT是检测狂犬病抗体最敏感和特异的方法,但成本更高且操作更困难。IFI可识别晚期核衣壳抗体,但报告的假阳性和假阴性结果更多。EIA-V和EIA-P方法高效、灵敏、特异且成本低廉,适用于常规检测接种HDCV疫苗15天后抗体保护效价高于0.5 IU/ml的情况。