Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, JohnsHopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):330-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs029. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
Quality improvement programs often pose unique project management challenges, including multi-faceted interventions that evolve over time and teams with few resources for data collection. Thus, it is difficult to report methods and results. We developed a program to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and improve safety culture in intensive care units (ICUs). As previously reported, we worked with 103 Michigan ICUs to implement this program, and they achieved a 66% reduction in the median CLABSI rate and sustained the reduction. This success prompted the spread of this program to Spain, England, Peru and across the USA. We developed a logical framework approach (LFA) to guide project management; to incorporate the cultural, clinical and capacity variations among countries; and to ensure early alignment of the project's design and evaluation. In this paper, we describe the use of the LFA to systematically design, implement and evaluate large-scale, multi-faceted, quality improvement programs.
质量改进计划通常会带来独特的项目管理挑战,包括随着时间的推移而不断演变的多方面干预措施,以及数据收集资源有限的团队。因此,报告方法和结果具有一定难度。我们制定了一个旨在减少重症监护病房(ICU)中中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)并改善安全文化的计划。如前所述,我们与密歇根州的 103 家 ICU 合作实施了该计划,使 CLABSI 发生率中位数降低了 66%,并保持了这一降低水平。这一成功促使该计划在西班牙、英国、秘鲁和美国各地推广。我们采用逻辑框架方法(LFA)来指导项目管理;纳入各国之间的文化、临床和能力差异;并确保项目设计和评估的早期一致性。在本文中,我们描述了使用 LFA 来系统地设计、实施和评估大规模、多方面的质量改进计划。