Suppr超能文献

运用逻辑模型设计和评估质量及患者安全改进项目。

Using a logic model to design and evaluate quality and patient safety improvement programs.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, JohnsHopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):330-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs029. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

Abstract

Quality improvement programs often pose unique project management challenges, including multi-faceted interventions that evolve over time and teams with few resources for data collection. Thus, it is difficult to report methods and results. We developed a program to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and improve safety culture in intensive care units (ICUs). As previously reported, we worked with 103 Michigan ICUs to implement this program, and they achieved a 66% reduction in the median CLABSI rate and sustained the reduction. This success prompted the spread of this program to Spain, England, Peru and across the USA. We developed a logical framework approach (LFA) to guide project management; to incorporate the cultural, clinical and capacity variations among countries; and to ensure early alignment of the project's design and evaluation. In this paper, we describe the use of the LFA to systematically design, implement and evaluate large-scale, multi-faceted, quality improvement programs.

摘要

质量改进计划通常会带来独特的项目管理挑战,包括随着时间的推移而不断演变的多方面干预措施,以及数据收集资源有限的团队。因此,报告方法和结果具有一定难度。我们制定了一个旨在减少重症监护病房(ICU)中中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)并改善安全文化的计划。如前所述,我们与密歇根州的 103 家 ICU 合作实施了该计划,使 CLABSI 发生率中位数降低了 66%,并保持了这一降低水平。这一成功促使该计划在西班牙、英国、秘鲁和美国各地推广。我们采用逻辑框架方法(LFA)来指导项目管理;纳入各国之间的文化、临床和能力差异;并确保项目设计和评估的早期一致性。在本文中,我们描述了使用 LFA 来系统地设计、实施和评估大规模、多方面的质量改进计划。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验