Division of Kidney Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, North Shore University Hospital and Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA.
Ren Fail. 2012;34(8):1043-5. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2012.697443. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
Medical educators have called for new teaching methods and materials that supplement the traditional lecture format, and education in a range of health professions, including medicine, nursing, and pharmacy, is using a game-based approach to teach learners. Here, we describe a novel teaching tool in a case-based debate using the game format. Two teams of first- and second-year nephrology fellows participated in a PowerPoint game-based debate about which tests to order to diagnose transplant-related case. Our pilot study assessed the participant acceptance of case-based debate sessions and rewards system, and participant perceptions of using this approach to teach fellows and residents the importance of each test ordered and its cost-effectiveness in medicine. Each test ordered requires an explanation and has a point value attached to it (based on relevance and cost of positive and negative test results). The team that comes up with the diagnosis with most points wins the game. A faculty member leads a short concluding discussion. Subjective evaluations found these case-based debates to be highly entertaining and thought-provoking and to enhance self-directed learning.
医学教育者呼吁采用新的教学方法和材料来补充传统的讲座形式,包括医学、护理和药学在内的一系列健康专业都在采用基于游戏的方法来教授学习者。在这里,我们使用游戏形式描述了一种基于案例的辩论的新教学工具。两组第一年和第二年的肾病研究员参加了一个基于 PowerPoint 的游戏式辩论,内容是为诊断与移植相关的病例应该开哪些检查。我们的试点研究评估了参与者对基于案例的辩论会议和奖励系统的接受程度,以及参与者对使用这种方法来教授研究员和住院医师的看法,即了解每个检查的重要性及其在医学中的成本效益。每个开的检查都需要解释,并附有一个分数(基于阳性和阴性检查结果的相关性和成本)。提出诊断结果分数最高的团队赢得比赛。一名教师主持简短的总结讨论。主观评估发现,这些基于案例的辩论非常有趣且发人深省,并增强了自我指导学习的能力。