• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经外科学中的疗效比较:意义、衡量方法和重要性。

Comparative effectiveness in neurosurgery: what it means, how it is measured, and why it matters.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Jul;33(1):E1. doi: 10.3171/2012.2.FOCUS1232.

DOI:10.3171/2012.2.FOCUS1232
PMID:22746226
Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research has recently been the subject of intense discussion. With congressional support, there has been increasing funding and publication of studies using comparative effectiveness and related methodology. The neurosurgical field has been relatively slow to accept and embrace this approach. The author outlines the procedures and rationale of comparative effectiveness, illustrates how it applies to neurosurgical topics, and explains its importance.

摘要

比较效果研究最近成为了激烈讨论的主题。在美国国会的支持下,越来越多的使用比较效果和相关方法的研究得到了资金和发表的支持。神经外科学领域相对较慢地接受并采用这种方法。作者概述了比较效果的程序和基本原理,说明了它如何应用于神经外科主题,并解释了它的重要性。

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness in neurosurgery: what it means, how it is measured, and why it matters.神经外科学中的疗效比较:意义、衡量方法和重要性。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Jul;33(1):E1. doi: 10.3171/2012.2.FOCUS1232.
2
Comparative effectiveness research in spine surgery.脊柱外科的比较效果研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Jul;33(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2012.4.FOCUS1290.
3
Publication patterns of comparative effectiveness research in spine neurosurgery.脊柱神经外科中比较有效性研究的发表模式。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Jul;33(1):E9. doi: 10.3171/2012.5.FOCUS1292.
4
Comparative effectiveness research in neurosurgery.神经外科的比较疗效研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Jul;33(1):2 prior to E1. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12223.
5
Designing quality health services research: why comparative effectiveness studies are needed and why pharmacists should be involved.设计高质量的卫生服务研究:为何需要比较效果研究以及为何药剂师应参与其中。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Aug;30(8):751-7. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.8.751.
6
A comparative effectiveness analysis of alternative strategies to assess hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function after microsurgical resection of pituitary tumors.垂体瘤微创手术后评估下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能的替代策略的比较效果分析。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Jun;68(6):1576-84; discussion 1585. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820cd45a.
7
Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: what is Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and why is it important?比较效果研究与监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库:什么是比较效果研究(CER)以及它为何重要?
Curr Probl Cancer. 2012 Jul-Aug;36(4):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Comparative-effectiveness research in cataract and refractive surgery: the CATT call.白内障与屈光手术的比较效果研究:CATT倡议
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Sep;37(9):1569-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.022.
9
Can the pharmaceutical industry embrace comparative effectiveness research? A view from inside.制药行业能接受比较效果研究吗?来自行业内部的观点。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Oct;13(5):565-8. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2013.833061. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
10
Report outlines best practices in patient-centered outcomes research.报告概述了以患者为中心的结局研究的最佳实践。
Am J Nurs. 2014 Feb;114(2):16. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000443760.99818.a0.

引用本文的文献

1
Supratentorial Pediatric Midline Tumors and Tumor-like Lesions: Clinical Spectrum, Natural History and Treatment Options.幕上小儿中线肿瘤及肿瘤样病变:临床谱、自然史及治疗选择
Children (Basel). 2022 Apr 9;9(4):534. doi: 10.3390/children9040534.
2
Comparative effectiveness of surgery in traumatic acute subdural and intracerebral haematoma: study protocol for a prospective observational study within CENTER-TBI and Net-QuRe.创伤性急性硬膜下和脑内血肿手术的比较效果:CENTER-TBI和Net-QuRe内一项前瞻性观察性研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 16;9(10):e033513. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033513.