Sufit Alexandra, Donson Andrew M, Birks Diane K, Knipstein Jeffrey A, Fenton Laura Z, Jedlicka Paul, Hankinson Todd C, Handler Michael H, Foreman Nicholas K
Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Colorado, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012 Aug;10(2):81-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.PEDS11316. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
The diagnosis of diffuse pontine tumors has largely been made on the basis of MRI since the early 1990 s. In cases of tumors considered "typical," as a rule, no biopsy specimen has been obtained, and the tumors have been considered diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs). There have been sporadic reports that primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) of the pons may not be distinguishable from the DIPGs by radiological imaging. This study presents 2 cases of diffuse pontine PNETs with molecular evidence that these are indeed PNETs, distinct from DIPGs, thus supporting biopsy of diffuse pontine tumors as a standard of care.
Biopsy specimens were obtained from 7 diffuse pontine tumors and snap frozen. Two of these 7 tumors were identified on the basis of pathological examination as PNETs. All 7 of the diffuse pontine tumors were analyzed for gene expression using the Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip microarray. Gene expression was compared with that of supratentorial PNETs, medulloblastomas, and low- and high-grade gliomas outside the brainstem.
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of gene expression demonstrated that pontine PNETs are most closely related to PNETs of the supratentorial region and not with gliomas. They do not cluster with the 5 DIPGs in the study. Thirty-eight genes, including GATA3, are uniquely differentially expressed in pontine PNETs compared with other types of pediatric brain tumors, including DIPGs and other PNETs at a false discovery rate statistical significance of less than 0.05.
The cluster and individual gene expression analyses indicate that pontine PNETs are intrinsically different from DIPGs. The 2 pontine PNET cases cluster with supratentorial PNETs, rather than with DIPGs, suggesting that these tumors should be treated with a PNET regimen, not with DIPG therapy. Since diagnosis by imaging is not reliable and the biology of the tumors is disparate, a biopsy should be performed to enable accurate diagnosis and direct potentially more effective treatments.
自20世纪90年代初以来,弥漫性脑桥肿瘤的诊断主要基于磁共振成像(MRI)。在被认为是“典型”的肿瘤病例中,通常未获取活检标本,这些肿瘤被视为弥漫性脑桥内在性胶质瘤(DIPG)。有零星报道称,脑桥的原始神经外胚层肿瘤(PNET)在放射影像学上可能无法与DIPG区分开来。本研究报告了2例弥漫性脑桥PNET病例,有分子证据表明这些确实是PNET,与DIPG不同,从而支持将弥漫性脑桥肿瘤的活检作为一种标准治疗手段。
从7例弥漫性脑桥肿瘤获取活检标本并速冻。这7例肿瘤中的2例经病理检查确诊为PNET。使用Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0基因芯片微阵列对所有7例弥漫性脑桥肿瘤进行基因表达分析。将基因表达与幕上PNET、髓母细胞瘤以及脑干外的低级别和高级别胶质瘤进行比较。
基因表达的无监督层次聚类分析表明,脑桥PNET与幕上区域的PNET关系最为密切,而非与胶质瘤。它们在研究中不与5例DIPG聚类。与其他类型的儿童脑肿瘤(包括DIPG和其他PNET)相比,包括GATA3在内的38个基因在脑桥PNET中独特地差异表达,错误发现率统计显著性小于0.05。
聚类和单个基因表达分析表明,脑桥PNET与DIPG本质上不同。2例脑桥PNET病例与幕上PNET聚类,而非与DIPG聚类,这表明这些肿瘤应采用PNET治疗方案,而非DIPG治疗方法。由于影像学诊断不可靠且肿瘤生物学特性不同,应进行活检以实现准确诊断并指导可能更有效的治疗。