Division of Urology/Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA.
Urology. 2012 Jul;80(1):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.026.
To identify whether RENAL nephrometry score is associated with partial nephrectomy (PN) technique. RENAL nephrometry score quantifies anatomic characteristics of renal tumors. Data are limited regarding clinical utility for surgical planning.
Multicenter analysis of patients undergoing PN for renal masses from March 2003 to May 2011. Cohort was stratified by surgical modality: open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN). Demographic and clinicopathological variables were compared between groups; RENAL score was calculated from preoperative imaging. Factors associated with choice of treatment modality and urine leak were entered into multivariable models.
One hundred fifty-three patients who underwent OPN, 100 patients who underwent LPN, and 31 patients who underwent RALPN were evaluated, the median tumor size (cm) was significantly larger for OPN (OPN 4.2 vs LPN 2.4 vs RALPN 2.0; P < .001); median operative time (minutes) and ischemia time (minutes) were shorter in OPN (OPN 190 and 25 vs LPN 200 and 29 vs RALPN 195 and 30; P = .042 and P < .001). Mean RENAL score was highest in OPN (OPN 8 vs LPN 6.3 vs RALPN 6.4; P < .001). No significant differences were noted in overall/high-grade complication rates (Clavien, P = .441/.985). On multivariate analysis, there was a 55% increased odds of undergoing OPN for each increase in RENAL score (P < .001). Higher RENAL score was associated with increased odds of urine leak (odds ratios [OR], 1.56; P = .002).
RENAL nephrometry score was associated with type of surgical approach (open vs laparoscopic/robotic) and urine leak. RENAL score may be useful as a decision-making tool in evaluation of patients for nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Further investigation is requisite.
确定肾脏分段评分是否与部分肾切除术(PN)技术相关。肾脏分段评分量化了肾脏肿瘤的解剖特征。关于手术规划的临床应用,数据有限。
对 2003 年 3 月至 2011 年 5 月期间接受肾部分切除术治疗的肾肿瘤患者进行多中心分析。根据手术方式将队列分层:开放性肾部分切除术(OPN)、腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)和机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术(RALPN)。比较组间的人口统计学和临床病理学变量;从术前影像学计算肾脏分段评分。将与治疗方式选择和尿漏相关的因素纳入多变量模型。
评估了 153 例接受 OPN、100 例接受 LPN 和 31 例接受 RALPN 的患者,OPN 的中位肿瘤大小(cm)明显更大(OPN 4.2 比 LPN 2.4 比 RALPN 2.0;P<0.001);OPN 的中位手术时间(分钟)和缺血时间(分钟)更短(OPN 190 和 25 比 LPN 200 和 29 比 RALPN 195 和 30;P=0.042 和 P<0.001)。OPN 的平均肾脏分段评分最高(OPN 8 比 LPN 6.3 比 RALPN 6.4;P<0.001)。总体/高级别并发症发生率(Clavien)无显著差异(P=0.441/0.985)。多变量分析显示,肾脏分段评分每增加 1 分,接受 OPN 的几率增加 55%(P<0.001)。较高的肾脏分段评分与尿漏的几率增加相关(比值比 [OR],1.56;P=0.002)。
肾脏分段评分与手术方式(开放性与腹腔镜/机器人)和尿漏有关。肾脏分段评分可能是评估保肾手术(NSS)患者的有用决策工具。需要进一步研究。