• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性硬化症患者早期起始fingolimod 与肌内注射干扰素β-1a 1 年后延迟起始的成本效益比较。

Cost-effectiveness of early initiation of fingolimod versus delayed initiation after 1 year of intramuscular interferon beta-1a in patients with multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Health Economics & Outcomes Research, One HealthPlaza, East Hanover, NJ 07936-1080, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2012 Jul;34(7):1583-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.012
PMID:22749258
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fingolimod is a once-daily orally administered disease-modifying therapy (DMT) indicated for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) to reduce the frequency of clinical relapses and delay accumulation of physical disability. In the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TRANSFORMS trial, 0.5 mg/d oral fingolimod substantially reduced relapse frequency when compared with IM interferon-β1a (IFN-β1a) at 12-months. In a 12-month, double-blind, extension phase of the TRANSFORMS study, patients assigned to receive fingolimod continued to receive the same dosage, whereas patients who originally received IM IFN-β1a were randomized to receive either 0.5 or 1.25 mg/d fingolimod.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of initiating fingolimod therapy early versus after 1 year of IFN-β1a therapy using TRANSFORMS study extension data.

METHODS

A Microsoft Excel-based model was used to calculate the cost per relapse avoided for 2 years with continuous treatment with fingolimod compared with first-year treatment with IM IFN-β1a and second-year treatment with fingolimod. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted on key input variables to assess their effect on cost per relapse avoided.

RESULTS

The 2-year relapse rate in the early fingolimod arm was 0.23, and in the delayed fingolimod arm was 0.53. The cost per relapse avoided was $83,125 in the early fingolimod arm versus $103,624 in the delayed fingolimod arm. Results of the sensitivity analyses showed an effect of drug acquisition cost and number of relapses in patients who received no treatment.

CONCLUSION

Continuous treatment with fingolimod for 2 years resulted in a lower cost per relapse avoided compared with treatment with IM IFN-β1a for the first year and then switching to fingolimod therapy. Thus, delaying fingolimod therapy does not seem to be cost effective.

摘要

背景

芬戈莫德是一种每日口服一次的疾病修正治疗药物(DMT),用于治疗多发性硬化症(MS)的复发形式,以降低临床复发频率并延迟身体残疾的积累。在随机、双盲、III 期 TRANSFORMS 试验中,与 12 个月时的肌内注射干扰素-β1a(IFN-β1a)相比,0.5mg/d 口服芬戈莫德可显著降低复发频率。在 TRANSFORMS 研究的 12 个月双盲扩展阶段,接受芬戈莫德治疗的患者继续接受相同剂量的治疗,而最初接受肌内 IFN-β1a 治疗的患者被随机分配接受 0.5 或 1.25mg/d 芬戈莫德治疗。

目的

利用 TRANSFORMS 研究扩展数据,研究早期开始芬戈莫德治疗与在 IFN-β1a 治疗 1 年后开始治疗的成本效益。

方法

使用基于 Microsoft Excel 的模型计算与第一年肌内 IFN-β1a 治疗和第二年芬戈莫德治疗相比,连续使用芬戈莫德治疗两年的每例复发避免成本。对关键输入变量进行单因素敏感性分析,以评估其对每例复发避免成本的影响。

结果

早期芬戈莫德组的 2 年复发率为 0.23,延迟芬戈莫德组为 0.53。早期芬戈莫德组的每例复发避免成本为 83125 美元,而延迟芬戈莫德组为 103624 美元。敏感性分析结果显示药物获得成本和未接受治疗的患者复发次数的影响。

结论

与第一年肌内 IFN-β1a 治疗然后转换为芬戈莫德治疗相比,连续使用芬戈莫德治疗两年可降低每例复发避免成本。因此,延迟芬戈莫德治疗似乎并不具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of early initiation of fingolimod versus delayed initiation after 1 year of intramuscular interferon beta-1a in patients with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者早期起始fingolimod 与肌内注射干扰素β-1a 1 年后延迟起始的成本效益比较。
Clin Ther. 2012 Jul;34(7):1583-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
2
Cost-effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.在美国,芬戈莫德与干扰素β-1a 治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1088-96. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.693553. Epub 2012 May 24.
3
Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis.口服芬戈莫德或肌肉注射干扰素治疗复发型多发性硬化。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):402-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907839. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
4
Comparison of fingolimod with interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised extension of the TRANSFORMS study.在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中比较芬戈莫德与干扰素 β-1a:TRANSFORMS 研究的随机扩展。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jun;10(6):520-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70099-0. Epub 2011 May 13.
5
A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis.一项口服芬戈莫德治疗复发性多发性硬化的安慰剂对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):387-401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909494. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
6
Cost-effectiveness of natalizumab versus fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):617-27. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.602444. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
7
Oral fingolimod for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.口服芬戈莫德治疗复发性多发性硬化症患者。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;65(8):887-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02721.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
8
Effect of switching from intramuscular interferon β-1a to oral fingolimod on time to relapse in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis enrolled in a 1-year extension of TRANSFORMS.在一项为期1年的TRANSFORMS扩展研究中,复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者从肌肉注射干扰素β-1a转换为口服芬戈莫德对复发时间的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
9
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较疾病修饰药物用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的成本效益。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Sep;15(7):543-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.7.543.
10
Cost effectiveness of fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate and intramuscular interferon-β1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德、特立氟胺、富马酸二甲酯及肌肉注射干扰素β-1a治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益
CNS Drugs. 2015 Jan;29(1):71-81. doi: 10.1007/s40263-014-0207-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Fingolimod in Iranian Patients with Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis.芬戈莫德在伊朗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者中的安全性和有效性
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2021 Mar-Apr;12(2):233-242. doi: 10.32598/bcn.12.2.1681.1. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.复发型多发性硬化症的经济学评估如何随时间演变?一项系统文献综述。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):557-583. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.
复发缓解型和原发进展型多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗:成本效用分析。
CNS Drugs. 2018 Dec;32(12):1145-1157. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0566-9.
4
Modeling Approaches in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.疾病修正治疗缓解复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析中的建模方法:更新的系统评价和对未来经济评估的建议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Oct;36(10):1223-1252. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0683-9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of oral agents in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis compared to interferon-based therapy in Saudi Arabia.在沙特阿拉伯,与基于干扰素的疗法相比,口服药物治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益。
Ann Saudi Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;37(6):433-443. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2017.433.
6
Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Literature Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies.多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗:成本效益研究的系统文献回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):189-204. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0577-2.
7
Efficacy of fingolimod is superior to injectable disease modifying therapies in second-line therapy of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.在复发缓解型多发性硬化症的二线治疗中,芬戈莫德的疗效优于注射用疾病修正疗法。
J Neurol. 2016 Feb;263(2):327-333. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7970-6. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
Cost-effectiveness analyses in multiple sclerosis: a review of modelling approaches.多发性硬化症的成本效益分析:建模方法综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jun;32(6):559-72. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0150-1.