McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Oct 1;21(19):4237-52. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds247. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
Various small molecule pharmacologic agents with different known functions produce similar outcomes in diverse Mendelian and complex disorders, suggesting that they may induce common cellular effects. These molecules include histone deacetylase inhibitors, 4-phenylbutyrate (4PBA) and trichostatin A, and two small molecules without direct histone deacetylase inhibitor activity, hydroxyurea (HU) and sulforaphane. In some cases, the therapeutic effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors have been attributed to an increase in expression of genes related to the disease-causing gene. However, here we show that the pharmacological induction of mitochondrial biogenesis was necessary for the potentially therapeutic effects of 4PBA or HU in two distinct disease models, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy and sickle cell disease. We hypothesized that a common cellular response to these four molecules is induction of mitochondrial biogenesis and peroxisome proliferation and activation of the stress proteome, or adaptive cell survival response. Treatment of human fibroblasts with these four agents induced mitochondrial and peroxisomal biogenesis as monitored by flow cytometry, immunofluorescence and/or western analyses. In treated normal human fibroblasts, all four agents induced the adaptive cell survival response: heat shock, unfolded protein, autophagic and antioxidant responses and the c-jun N-terminal kinase pathway, at the transcriptional and translational levels. Thus, activation of the evolutionarily conserved stress proteome and mitochondrial biogenesis may be a common cellular response to such small molecule therapy and a common basis of therapeutic action in various diseases. Modulation of this novel therapeutic target could broaden the range of treatable diseases without directly targeting the causative genetic abnormalities.
各种具有不同已知功能的小分子药物在不同的孟德尔和复杂疾病中产生相似的结果,这表明它们可能诱导共同的细胞效应。这些分子包括组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂、4-苯基丁酸(4PBA)和曲古抑菌素 A,以及两种没有直接组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂活性的小分子药物,即羟基脲(HU)和萝卜硫素。在某些情况下,组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂的治疗效果归因于与致病基因相关的基因表达增加。然而,在这里我们表明,线粒体生物发生的药理学诱导对于 4PBA 或 HU 在两种不同疾病模型(X 连锁肾上腺脑白质营养不良和镰状细胞病)中的潜在治疗效果是必要的。我们假设,这四种分子的共同细胞反应是诱导线粒体生物发生和过氧化物酶体增殖以及应激蛋白质组的激活,或适应性细胞存活反应。用这四种药物处理人成纤维细胞,通过流式细胞术、免疫荧光和/或 western 分析监测到线粒体和过氧化物酶体生物发生。在处理的正常人类成纤维细胞中,这四种药物都诱导适应性细胞存活反应:热休克、未折叠蛋白、自噬和抗氧化反应以及 c-jun N 末端激酶途径,在转录和翻译水平上。因此,进化上保守的应激蛋白质组和线粒体生物发生的激活可能是这种小分子治疗的共同细胞反应,也是各种疾病治疗作用的共同基础。这种新型治疗靶点的调节可以扩大可治疗疾病的范围,而无需直接针对致病遗传异常。