• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传粉媒介接触到植保产品。

Exposure of pollinators to plant protection products.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Ecotoxicology. 2012 Nov;21(8):2177-85. doi: 10.1007/s10646-012-0971-7. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10646-012-0971-7
PMID:22752801
Abstract

As a general rule, environmental risk for chemicals is characterised by comparing an expected exposure level (e.g. PEC) with an ecotoxicological endpoint. The same approach is generally used for plant protection products (PPPs). However, in some cases, suitable procedures for a precise quantification of exposure are not available. The common risk assessment procedure for pollinators based on the hazard quotient, where the agronomic application rate is assumed as an exposure indicator, is an example. In this work, a semi-quantitative index to assess exposure to PPPs for organisms with a large forage area is presented. The proposed index was already applied in a previous work on risk assessment for pollinators, for this reason the validation steps (sampling area, collected samples, samples distribution) were planned bearing in mind the characteristic and the behaviour of these organisms and using Apis mellifera as representative of pollinators. The starting point for the development of the index is the assumption that exposure depends not only on environmental fate of pesticides but also on the feeding behaviour of the target organisms (in this context meant as target of the assessment). The developed index was applied and validated in different experimental areas of 4 × 4 km located in North-East Italy (Veneto region) characterised by a different level of impact. A sensitivity analysis of the index was performed evaluating the influence of the dataset resolution on the predictive efficiency. The obtained results indicate a good agreement between predicted and measured concentrations, supporting the suitability of the index to improve exposure assessment for pollinators.

摘要

一般来说,化学物质的环境风险是通过将预期暴露水平(如 PEC)与生态毒理学终点进行比较来确定的。同样的方法通常也适用于植物保护产品(PPPs)。然而,在某些情况下,无法获得精确量化暴露的适用程序。基于危害商数的授粉媒介共同风险评估程序就是一个例子,其中农业应用率被视为暴露指标。在这项工作中,提出了一种用于评估具有大面积饲料区的生物体接触 PPPs 的半定量指数。该指数已在前一篇关于授粉媒介风险评估的工作中得到应用,因此验证步骤(采样区域、采集的样本、样本分布)是根据这些生物体的特性和行为进行规划的,并以蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)作为授粉媒介的代表。该指数的开发基于这样一种假设,即暴露不仅取决于农药的环境归宿,还取决于目标生物体的摄食行为(在这种情况下,指的是评估的目标)。该指数已在意大利东北部(威尼托地区)的不同实验区应用和验证,这些实验区的面积为 4×4 公里,具有不同的影响水平。通过评估数据集分辨率对预测效率的影响,对该指数进行了敏感性分析。得到的结果表明,预测浓度与实测浓度之间具有良好的一致性,支持该指数用于改进授粉媒介暴露评估的适用性。

相似文献

1
Exposure of pollinators to plant protection products.传粉媒介接触到植保产品。
Ecotoxicology. 2012 Nov;21(8):2177-85. doi: 10.1007/s10646-012-0971-7. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
2
Risk to pollinators from the use of chlorpyrifos in the United States.在美国使用毒死蜱对授粉媒介的风险。
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;231:219-65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03865-0_7.
3
A novel method for assessing risks to pollinators from plant protection products using honeybees as a model species.一种利用蜜蜂作为模式物种评估植物保护产品对传粉媒介风险的新方法。
Ecotoxicology. 2010 Oct;19(7):1347-59. doi: 10.1007/s10646-010-0521-0. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
4
Predicting acute contact toxicity of pesticides in honeybees (Apis mellifera) through a k-nearest neighbor model.通过k近邻模型预测农药对蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的急性接触毒性。
Chemosphere. 2017 Jan;166:438-444. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.092. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
5
Endocrine disruption and chronic effects of plant protection products in bees: Can we better protect our pollinators?内分泌干扰和植物保护产品对蜜蜂的慢性影响:我们能否更好地保护传粉者?
Environ Pollut. 2018 Dec;243(Pt B):1588-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.117. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
6
Pesticide fate in cultivated mountain basins: The improved DynAPlus model for predicting peak exposure and directing sustainable monitoring campaigns to protect aquatic ecosystems.在耕作的山间盆地中农药的归宿:用于预测峰值暴露和指导可持续监测活动以保护水生态系统的改进型 DynAPlus 模型。
Chemosphere. 2018 Nov;210:204-214. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.181. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
7
Exposure of native bees foraging in an agricultural landscape to current-use pesticides.在农业景观中觅食的本地蜜蜂接触到目前使用的农药。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;542(Pt A):469-77. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.077. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Exposure of honey bees (Apis mellifera) to different classes of insecticides exhibit distinct molecular effect patterns at concentrations that mimic environmental contamination.在模拟环境污染的浓度下,不同类别的杀虫剂暴露于蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)会表现出明显不同的分子效应模式。
Environ Pollut. 2017 Jul;226:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
9
Effects of sublethal doses of crop protection agents on honey bee (Apis mellifera) global colony vitality and its potential link with aberrant foraging activity.亚致死剂量的农作物保护剂对蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)全球蜂群活力的影响及其与异常觅食活动的潜在联系。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2009;74(1):245-53.
10
Social disruption: Sublethal pesticides in pollen lead to Apis mellifera queen events and brood loss.社会动荡:花粉中的亚致死农药会导致蜜蜂蜂王事件和幼虫损失。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 May;214:112105. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112105. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The power to (detect) change: Can honey bee collected pollen be used to monitor pesticide residues in the landscape?(检测)变化的能力:收集的蜜蜂花粉可用于监测景观中的农药残留吗?
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0309236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309236. eCollection 2024.
2
Combined Effects of Pesticides and Electromagnetic-Fields on Honeybees: Multi-Stress Exposure.农药与电磁场对蜜蜂的联合影响:多重应激暴露
Insects. 2021 Aug 10;12(8):716. doi: 10.3390/insects12080716.
3
Using problem formulation for fit-for-purpose pre-market environmental risk assessments of regulated stressors.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel method for assessing risks to pollinators from plant protection products using honeybees as a model species.一种利用蜜蜂作为模式物种评估植物保护产品对传粉媒介风险的新方法。
Ecotoxicology. 2010 Oct;19(7):1347-59. doi: 10.1007/s10646-010-0521-0. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
2
Estimating ecotoxicological effects of pesticide drift on nontarget arthropods in field hedgerows.评估农药漂移对田间树篱中非靶标节肢动物的生态毒理学影响。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Apr;28(4):853-63. doi: 10.1897/08-260R.1.
3
Establishment of a cross-European field site network in the ALARM project for assessing large-scale changes in biodiversity.
利用问题表述进行受监管应激源的适用前市场环境风险评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Jul 8;17(Suppl 1):e170708. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170708. eCollection 2019 Jul.
4
The association of windmills with conservation of pollinating insects and wild plants in homogeneous farmland of western Poland.波兰西部同种农田中风车与传粉昆虫和野生植物保护的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(7):6273-6284. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0864-7. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Current knowledge of detoxification mechanisms of xenobiotic in honey bees.蜜蜂对外源化合物解毒机制的当前认知。
Ecotoxicology. 2017 Jan;26(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10646-016-1742-7. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
在 ALARM 项目中建立跨欧洲实地站点网络,以评估生物多样性的大规模变化。
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 May;164(1-4):337-48. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0896-7. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
4
Prediction of agrochemical residue data on fruit using an informatic system (PARDIS model).利用信息系统预测水果上的农药残留数据(PARDIS模型)。
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Oct;64(10):981-8. doi: 10.1002/ps.1608.
5
Contaminant exposure in terrestrial vertebrates.陆生脊椎动物中的污染物暴露。
Environ Pollut. 2007 Nov;150(1):41-64. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.009. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
6
New risk assessment approach for systemic insecticides: the case of honey bees and imidacloprid (Gaucho).系统性杀虫剂的新风险评估方法:以蜜蜂和吡虫啉(高巧)为例。
Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Apr 1;40(7):2448-54. doi: 10.1021/es051392i.
7
Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves.比叶面积和干物质含量可估算叶片的厚度。
Ann Bot. 2005 Nov;96(6):1129-36. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci264. Epub 2005 Sep 13.
8
Hazard and risk assessment of chemicals for terrestrial ecosystems.化学品对陆地生态系统的危害与风险评估。
Toxicology. 2002 Dec 27;181-182:187-91. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00279-2.