Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29th St NW, Calgary, Canada.
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S132-42. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis338.
The microflora-sparing properties of fidaxomicin were examined during the conduct of a randomized clinical trial comparing vancomycin 125 mg 4 times per day versus fidaxomicin 200 mg twice per day for 10 days as treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Fecal samples were obtained from 89 patients (45 received fidaxomicin, and 44 received vancomycin) at study entry and on days 4, 10, 14, 21, 28, and 38 for quantitative cultures for C. difficile and cytotoxin B fecal filtrate concentrations. Additionally, samples from 10 patients, each receiving vancomycin or fidaxomicin, and 10 samples from healthy controls were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction with multiple group-specific primers to evaluate the impact of antibiotic treatment on the microbiome. Compared with controls, patients with CDI at study entry had counts of major microbiome components that were 2-3-log(10) colony-forming units (CFU)/g lower. In patients with CDI, fidaxomicin allowed the major components to persist, whereas vancomycin was associated with a further 2-4-log(10) CFU reduction of Bacteroides/Prevotella group organisms, which persisted to day 28 of the study, and shorter term and temporary suppression of both Clostridium coccoides and Clostridium leptum group organisms. In the posttreatment period, C. difficile counts similarly persisted in both study populations, but reappearance of toxin in fecal filtrates was observed in 28% of vancomycin-treated patient samples (29 of 94), compared with 14% of fidaxomicin-treated patient samples (13 of 91; P = .03). Similarly, 23% of vancomycin-treated patients (10 of 44) and 11% of fidaxomicin-treated patients (5 of 44) had recurrence of CDI. Whereas vancomycin and fidaxomicin are equally effective in resolving CDI symptoms, preservation of the microflora by fidaxomicin is associated with a lower likelihood of CDI recurrence.
在一项比较万古霉素 125mg,每日 4 次与非达霉素 200mg,每日 2 次,疗程均为 10 天,治疗艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的随机临床试验中,研究了非达霉素对微生物群的保护作用。89 例患者(45 例接受非达霉素,44 例接受万古霉素)在研究入组时以及第 4、10、14、21、28 和 38 天采集粪便标本,进行艰难梭菌定量培养和细胞毒素 B 粪便滤液浓度检测。此外,分析了 10 例接受万古霉素或非达霉素的患者样本和 10 例健康对照者样本,采用多重种特异性引物实时聚合酶链反应,评估抗生素治疗对微生物组的影响。与对照组相比,CDI 患者在研究入组时的主要微生物群组成部分的计数低 2-3 个对数 10 菌落形成单位(CFU)/g。在 CDI 患者中,非达霉素使主要成分得以持续存在,而万古霉素则导致拟杆菌/普雷沃菌属生物进一步减少 2-4 个对数 10CFU,这种减少持续到研究的第 28 天,并在短期内暂时抑制梭状芽胞杆菌 coccoides 和梭状芽胞杆菌 leptum 属生物。在治疗后阶段,两种研究人群的艰难梭菌计数均持续存在,但在万古霉素治疗的患者样本中(94 例中的 29 例,28%)观察到粪便滤液中再次出现毒素,而非达霉素治疗的患者样本中(91 例中的 13 例,14%)则无,两组间有差异(P=0.03)。同样,23%的万古霉素治疗患者(44 例中的 10 例)和 11%的非达霉素治疗患者(44 例中的 5 例)出现 CDI 复发。尽管万古霉素和非达霉素在缓解 CDI 症状方面同样有效,但非达霉素对微生物群的保护作用与 CDI 复发的可能性降低相关。