Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Atlanta GA 30333, USA.
Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):e365-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3478. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
To evaluate the duration of protection of pentavaent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) against rotavirus hospitalizations in Nicaragua, a developing country in Central America.
We conducted a case-control study at 4 hospitals from 2007 through 2010, including 1016 children hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed rotavirus diarrhea, 4930 controls with nonrotavirus diarrhea (ie, "test-negative"), and 5627 controls without diarrhea. All cases and controls were aged ≥ 6 months and born after August 2006. Outcomes included odds of antecedent vaccination between case-patients and controls, and effectiveness of vaccination (1 - adjusted odds ratio [OR] × 100). Duration of protection was assessed by comparing effectiveness among children aged <1 year compared with ≥ 1 year.
Indicators of socioeconomic conditions and nonrotavirus vaccination (oral polio vaccine and diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis/hepatitis A/hepatitis B) for test-negative controls were more comparable to the rotavirus case-patients than nondiarrhea controls. RV5 vaccination was associated with a significantly lower risk of rotavirus hospitalization by using test-negative controls (OR: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.74) and nondiarrhea controls (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.22-0.40). Risk of rotavirus hospitalization was twofold lower among RV5 vaccinated children aged <1 year (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.22-0.57) compared with RV5 vaccinated children aged ≥ 1 year (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.47-1.05).
RV5 provided good protection against severe rotavirus disease in Nicaragua during the first year of life, when most severe and fatal rotavirus disease in developing countries occurs. However, the decline in protection with age warrants monitoring of disease among older children and consideration of a booster dose evaluation at the end of infancy.
评估五价轮状病毒疫苗(RV5)在中美洲发展中国家尼加拉瓜预防轮状病毒住院的保护期。
我们于 2007 年至 2010 年在 4 家医院开展了病例对照研究,包括 1016 例经实验室确诊的轮状病毒腹泻住院患儿、4930 例非轮状病毒腹泻对照(即“阴性对照”)和 5627 例无腹泻对照。所有病例和对照均≥6 月龄,且均于 2006 年 8 月后出生。结局包括病例组与对照组患儿的疫苗接种前发病比值比(adjusted odds ratio,aOR),以及疫苗有效性(1 - aOR×100)。通过比较<1 岁与≥1 岁儿童的疫苗有效性来评估保护期。
阴性对照的社会经济条件和非轮状病毒疫苗(口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗、白喉、破伤风、百日咳、甲型肝炎和乙型肝炎)指标与轮状病毒病例组更为可比,而非无腹泻对照组。与阴性对照(aOR:0.55;95%置信区间[CI]:0.41-0.74)和无腹泻对照组(aOR:0.30;95% CI:0.22-0.40)相比,RV5 疫苗接种与轮状病毒住院风险显著降低相关。与≥1 岁 RV5 疫苗接种儿童(aOR:0.70;95% CI:0.47-1.05)相比,<1 岁 RV5 疫苗接种儿童的轮状病毒住院风险降低 2 倍(aOR:0.36;95% CI:0.22-0.57)。
在发展中国家大多数严重和致命轮状病毒病发生的生命最初 1 年,RV5 对尼加拉瓜严重轮状病毒病提供了良好保护。然而,随着年龄的增长保护作用下降,这需要监测大龄儿童的疾病情况,并考虑在婴儿期结束时评估加强剂量。