Hier S J, Korboot P J, Schweitzer R D
University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Adolescence. 1990 Winter;25(100):761-71.
Previous research on homeless adolescents has largely ignored the distinction between those who have left home on their own volition (runaways), and those who have been forced to leave (throwaways). Fifty-two homeless adolescents in Brisbane, Australia, were assessed to compare male and female runaways and throwaways for social adjustment and symptomatology. Differences for social adjustment (antisocial tendencies and aggression) and symptomatology (social isolation and depression) were predicted. Results indicated that male runaways were significantly more hostile than male throwaways (p less than .001), and significantly more socially isolated than female runaways (p less than .025). Female throwaways, however, were significantly more hostile than male throwaways (p less than .025) and female runaways (p less than .025). Yet homeless males overall had a significantly stronger urge to act out hostility than homeless females (p less than .025). In addition, female throwaways were significantly more antisocial than male throwaways (p less than .001). There were no significant differences for depression. A theory of inner social control (Hirschi, 1969), postulating absence of bonding in earlier socialization, was supported.
先前针对无家可归青少年的研究在很大程度上忽视了那些出于自身意愿离家出走的青少年(离家出走者)和那些被迫离家的青少年(被遗弃者)之间的区别。对澳大利亚布里斯班的52名无家可归青少年进行了评估,以比较男性和女性离家出走者与被遗弃者在社会适应和症状方面的差异。预计在社会适应(反社会倾向和攻击性)和症状(社会孤立和抑郁)方面会存在差异。结果表明,男性离家出走者比男性被遗弃者明显更具敌意(p小于0.001),并且比女性离家出走者明显更具社会孤立感(p小于0.025)。然而,女性被遗弃者比男性被遗弃者(p小于0.025)和女性离家出走者(p小于0.025)明显更具敌意。然而,总体而言,无家可归的男性比无家可归的女性有更强烈的敌意冲动(p小于0.025)。此外,女性被遗弃者比男性被遗弃者明显更具反社会倾向(p小于0.001)。在抑郁方面没有显著差异。一种内在社会控制理论(赫希,1969年),假设在早期社会化过程中缺乏联系,得到了支持。