Suppr超能文献

窃寄生者、社会寄生者和一个共同的宿主:访问宿主巢穴时的化学微不足道,在宿主巢穴中生活时的化学拟态。

Cleptoparasites, social parasites and a common host: chemical insignificance for visiting host nests, chemical mimicry for living in.

机构信息

Dept. of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123 Torino, Italy.

出版信息

J Insect Physiol. 2012 Sep;58(9):1259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

Abstract

Social insect colonies contain attractive resources for many organisms. Cleptoparasites sneak into their nests and steal food resources. Social parasites sneak into their social organisations and exploit them for reproduction. Both cleptoparasites and social parasites overcome the ability of social insects to detect intruders, which is mainly based on chemoreception. Here we compared the chemical strategies of social parasites and cleptoparasites that target the same host and analyse the implication of the results for the understanding of nestmate recognition mechanisms. The social parasitic wasp Polistes atrimandibularis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), and the cleptoparasitic velvet ant Mutilla europaea (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae), both target the colonies of the paper wasp Polistes biglumis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). There is no chemical mimicry with hosts in the cuticular chemical profiles of velvet ants and pre-invasion social parasites, but both have lower concentrations of recognition cues (chemical insignificance) and lower proportions of branched alkanes than their hosts. Additionally, they both have larger proportions of alkenes than their hosts. In contrast, post-invasion obligate social parasites have proportions of branched hydrocarbons as large as those of their hosts and their overall cuticular profiles resemble those of their hosts. These results suggest that the chemical strategies for evading host detection vary according to the lifestyles of the parasites. Cleptoparasites and pre-invasion social parasites that sneak into host colonies limit host overaggression by having few recognition cues, whereas post-invasion social parasites that sneak into their host social structure facilitate social integration by chemical mimicry with colony members.

摘要

社会性昆虫群体为许多生物提供了有吸引力的资源。拟寄生蜂潜入它们的巢穴并窃取食物资源。社会性寄生虫潜入它们的社会组织并利用它们进行繁殖。拟寄生蜂和社会性寄生虫都克服了社会性昆虫检测入侵者的能力,而这种能力主要基于化学感受。在这里,我们比较了针对同一宿主的社会性寄生虫和拟寄生蜂的化学策略,并分析了这些结果对理解巢内识别机制的意义。社会性寄生蜂 Polistes atrimandibularis(膜翅目:胡蜂科)和拟寄生的绒蚁 Mutilla europaea(膜翅目:绒蚁科)都以纸蜂 Polistes biglumis(膜翅目:胡蜂科)的巢穴为目标。在绒蚁和入侵前的社会性寄生虫的表皮化学特征中,没有与宿主的化学模拟,但它们的识别线索(化学无意义)浓度都比宿主低,且支链烷烃的比例也比宿主低。此外,它们的烯烃比例都比宿主大。相比之下,入侵后的专性社会性寄生虫的支链烃比例与宿主一样大,它们的整体表皮特征与宿主相似。这些结果表明,逃避宿主检测的化学策略因寄生虫的生活方式而异。潜入宿主群体的拟寄生蜂和入侵前的社会性寄生虫通过减少识别线索来限制宿主的过度攻击,而潜入宿主社会结构的入侵后的社会性寄生虫则通过与群体成员的化学模拟来促进社会融合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验