University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Knoxville, USA.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Jun 18;76(5):86. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76586.
To determine pharmacy students' knowledge retention from and comfort level with a patient-case simulation compared with a written patient case.
Pharmacy students were randomly assigned to participate in either a written patient case or a simulated patient case in which a high-fidelity mannequin was used to portray a patient experiencing a narcotic and acetaminophen overdose.
Participants' responses on a multiple-choice test and a survey instrument administered before the case, immediately after the case, and 25 days later indicated that participation in the simulated patient case did not result in greater knowledge retention or comfort level than participation in the written patient case. Students' knowledge improved post-intervention regardless of which teaching method was used.
Although further research is needed to determine whether the use of simulation in the PharmD curriculum is equivalent or superior to other teaching methods, students' enthusiasm for learning in a simulated environment where they can safely apply patient care skills make this technology worth exploring.
与书面病例相比,确定医学生从患者病例模拟中获得的知识保留程度和舒适度,并对此进行评估。
将医学生随机分配至书面病例组或模拟患者病例组,其中使用高保真人体模型来模拟经历阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚过量的患者。
在病例之前、之后以及 25 天后,通过多项选择题测试和问卷调查工具对参与者的反应进行评估,结果表明,与书面病例相比,参与模拟患者病例并未导致更高的知识保留率或舒适度。无论使用哪种教学方法,学生的知识都在干预后得到了提高。
尽管需要进一步研究来确定在 PharmD 课程中使用模拟是否与其他教学方法等效或更优,但学生在模拟环境中学习的热情,使他们能够安全地应用患者护理技能,这使得这项技术值得探索。