Suppr超能文献

美国辅助治疗胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)使用伊马替尼 3 年的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of 3-years of adjuvant imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in the United States.

机构信息

OptumInsight, Medford, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2013;16(1):150-9. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.709204. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trial data have demonstrated that 3 years vs 1 year of adjuvant imatinib therapy for patients with surgically resected Kit+ Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) leads to a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival and overall survival. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of treating patients with 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib from a US payer's perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to predict GIST recurrence and treatment costs. Patients enter the model after surgery and transition among three health states: free of recurrence, recurrence, and death. Recurrence, mortality, costs, and utilities were derived from clinical trial and published literature. Expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated and discounted at 3%/year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Patients receiving 3 years of imatinib had higher QALYs (8.53 vs 7.18) than those receiving 1 year of imatinib. Total lifetime per-patient cost was $302,100 for 3 years vs $217,800 for 1 year of imatinib. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib was $62,600/QALY. Model results were sensitive to long-term rate of GIST recurrence (beyond 5 years) and cost of imatinib. At a threshold of $100,000/QALY, 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib was cost-effective in 100% of simulations.

LIMITATIONS

The model is a simplified representation of disease natural history and may not account for all possible health states and complications associated with disease. Resource utilization on treatment was estimated using the resource use data from previous trials, therefore calculated medical costs might be over-estimated compared to the real-world setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Model results suggest that treatment with 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib is cost-effective at a $100,000/QALY threshold. Clinical and economic results suggest treating surgically resected Kit+ GIST patients with 3 years of imatinib would result in improved quality-adjusted survival.

摘要

背景

最近的临床试验数据表明,对于接受手术切除的 Kit+胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者,辅助伊马替尼治疗 3 年与 1 年相比,无复发生存率和总生存率显著提高。本研究从美国支付者的角度评估了治疗患者 3 年与 1 年伊马替尼的成本效益。

方法

建立了一个马尔可夫模型来预测 GIST 复发和治疗成本。患者手术后进入模型,并在三个健康状态之间转移:无复发、复发和死亡。复发、死亡率、成本和效用来自临床试验和已发表的文献。预计成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)以 3%/年贴现。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析。

结果

接受 3 年伊马替尼治疗的患者 QALY(8.53 比 7.18)高于接受 1 年伊马替尼治疗的患者。3 年每位患者的终身总费用为 302100 美元,而 1 年的费用为 217800 美元。3 年与 1 年伊马替尼相比,增量成本效益比为 62600 美元/QALY。模型结果对 GIST 复发(5 年以上)的长期率和伊马替尼的成本敏感。在 10 万美元/QALY 的阈值下,3 年与 1 年伊马替尼的治疗在 100%的模拟中具有成本效益。

局限性

该模型是疾病自然史的简化表示,可能无法考虑与疾病相关的所有可能健康状态和并发症。治疗的资源利用是根据以前试验的资源利用数据估计的,因此与实际情况相比,计算出的医疗成本可能会被高估。

结论

模型结果表明,在 10 万美元/QALY 的阈值下,3 年与 1 年伊马替尼的治疗具有成本效益。临床和经济结果表明,用 3 年伊马替尼治疗手术切除的 Kit+ GIST 患者可提高调整后的生存质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验