Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jul 4;12:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-64.
The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. GDM and the risks associated with GDM lead to increased health care costs and losses in productivity. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the FitFor2 exercise program during pregnancy is cost-effective from a societal perspective as compared to standard care.
A randomised controlled trial (RCT) and simultaneous economic evaluation of the FitFor2 program were conducted. Pregnant women at risk for GDM were randomised to an exercise program to prevent high maternal blood glucose (n = 62) or to standard care (n = 59). The exercise program consisted of two sessions of aerobic and strengthening exercises per week. Clinical outcome measures were maternal fasting blood glucose levels, insulin sensitivity and infant birth weight. Quality of life was measured using the EuroQol 5-D and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Resource utilization and sick leave data were collected by questionnaires. Data were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping techniques estimated the uncertainty surrounding the cost differences and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
There were no statistically significant differences in any outcome measure. During pregnancy, total health care costs and costs of productivity losses were statistically non-significant (mean difference €1308; 95%CI €-229 - €3204). The cost-effectiveness analyses showed that the exercise program was not cost-effective in comparison to the control group for blood glucose levels, insulin sensitivity, infant birth weight or QALYs.
The twice-weekly exercise program for pregnant women at risk for GDM evaluated in the present study was not cost-effective compared to standard care. Based on these results, implementation of this exercise program for the prevention of GDM cannot be recommended.
NTR1139.
妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的患病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势。GDM 及其相关风险导致医疗保健成本增加和生产力损失。本研究的目的是从社会角度评估 FitFor2 妊娠运动方案是否比标准护理更具成本效益。
进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)和 FitFor2 方案的同时经济评估。患有 GDM 风险的孕妇被随机分配到预防高母血葡萄糖的运动方案(n=62)或标准护理(n=59)。运动方案包括每周两次有氧运动和强化运动。临床结局指标为母亲空腹血糖水平、胰岛素敏感性和婴儿出生体重。使用 EuroQol 5-D 测量生活质量,并计算质量调整生命年(QALYs)。通过问卷收集资源利用和病假数据。根据意向治疗原则分析数据。使用多重插补法填补缺失数据。Bootstrapping 技术估计了成本差异和增量成本效益比的不确定性。
在任何结局指标上均无统计学差异。怀孕期间,总医疗保健成本和生产力损失成本无统计学显著差异(平均差异€1308;95%CI€-229 - €3204)。成本效益分析表明,与对照组相比,运动方案在血糖水平、胰岛素敏感性、婴儿出生体重或 QALYs 方面均不具有成本效益。
与标准护理相比,本研究评估的针对 GDM 高危孕妇的每周两次运动方案不具有成本效益。基于这些结果,不能推荐实施该运动方案来预防 GDM。
NTR1139。