Cantillon Peter, de Grave Willem
NUI, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Educ Prim Care. 2012 May;23(3):169-77. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494100.
Clinical teachers use several different types of knowledge in the act of teaching. These include content knowledge (subject matter), knowledge of how to teach (pedagogy) and knowledge of learners (context). Most attention in faculty development has been on how to teach rather than what is taught. The quality of a teacher's subject matter knowledge is likely to be a critical determinant of how well a subject is presented, communicated and learned. We therefore set out to examine teachers' subject matter knowledge in the context of a general practice tutorial on grade 1 hypertension.
This study is part of a larger study that employed a mixed method approach (concept mapping, phenomenological interviews and video-stimulated recall) to examine differences between clinical educators in subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and knowledge of the learning environment in the context of general practice education.
This paper presents the concept map data findings from the larger study as well as the parts of the phenomenological interviews that relate to subject matter knowledge and beliefs. We found that there were marked differences in the quality and elaborative structure of GP teachers' knowledge in the concept maps completed prior to the tutorials. These differences were also predictive of differences in the content presented to learners in tutorials. Teachers' beliefs about subject matter were also likely to have affected what they chose to teach about and how they presented it.
Subject matter knowledge varies considerably between GP teachers in the context of a common and relatively simple tutorial. Differences in the quality of subject matter knowledge matter because they have a profound effect on what is learned and how it is learned. Faculty development for clinical educators needs to pay heed to the quality of subject matter knowledge in addition to its more common pedagogical focus.
临床教师在教学过程中运用多种不同类型的知识。这些知识包括学科知识(主题内容)、教学方法知识(教学法)以及学习者知识(背景情况)。教师发展方面的大部分注意力都集中在如何教学上,而非教学内容。教师学科知识的质量很可能是一门课程讲解、传授和学习效果的关键决定因素。因此,我们着手在关于1级高血压的全科医疗教程背景下,研究教师的学科知识。
本研究是一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究采用混合方法(概念图、现象学访谈和视频激发回忆),以考察在全科医疗教育背景下,临床教育工作者在学科知识、教学法知识和学习环境知识方面的差异。
本文呈现了更大规模研究中的概念图数据结果,以及现象学访谈中与学科知识和信念相关的部分内容。我们发现,在教程之前完成的概念图中,全科医生教师的知识在质量和详细结构上存在显著差异。这些差异也预示着在教程中向学习者呈现的内容会有所不同。教师对学科内容的信念也可能影响了他们选择讲授的内容以及讲授方式。
在一个常见且相对简单的教程背景下,全科医生教师之间的学科知识差异相当大。学科知识质量的差异很重要,因为它们对所学内容以及学习方式有着深远影响。临床教育工作者的教师发展除了关注更常见的教学法重点外,还需要关注学科知识的质量。