• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于言语相关态度的BigCAT测量法与埃里克森S - 24测量法的对比研究。

A comparative investigation of the BigCAT and Erickson S-24 measures of speech-associated attitude.

作者信息

Vanryckeghem Martine, Brutten Gene J

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, FL 32816, USA.

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 2012 Sep-Oct;45(5):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.06.001
PMID:22763013
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The BigCAT and the Erickson S-24, self-report measures of communication attitude, were administered in a randomly determined order to 72 adults who stuttered (PWS) and 72 who did not (PWNS). The two groups of participants differed from each other to a statistically significant extent on both of these measures of speech-associated attitude, regardless of gender. However, the BigCAT showed a larger between-group difference and a greater effect size than was made apparent by the S-24. These findings, and the presence of a significant group by test interaction, suggest that the BigCAT is the more powerful of these two test procedures for discriminating the speech-associated attitude of PWS from that of PWNS. It follows from this that the BigCAT is likely a more useful attitudinal measure than the S-24 with respect to clinical decision making that relates to differential diagnostic assessment and the management of stuttering.

LEARNING OUTCOMES

The reader will be (1) describe the BigCAT, a communication attitude test for adults who do and do not stutter, (2) discuss comparative data on the BigCAT and the Erickson S-24, based on information on the discriminative power of these measures of speech-associated attitude, (3) recognize that gender does not significantly effect the results of either the BigCAT or the Erickson S-24.

摘要

未标注

对72名口吃成年人(PWS)和72名非口吃成年人(PWNS)以随机确定的顺序进行了BigCAT和埃里克森S - 24这两种沟通态度的自我报告测量。在这两种与言语相关态度的测量中,无论性别如何,两组参与者在统计学上都有显著差异。然而,与S - 24相比,BigCAT显示出更大的组间差异和更大的效应量。这些发现以及显著的组间与测试交互作用表明,在区分口吃者与非口吃者的言语相关态度方面,BigCAT是这两种测试程序中更有效的。由此可见,在与口吃的鉴别诊断评估和管理相关的临床决策方面,BigCAT可能比S - 24更有用处。

学习成果

读者将能够(1)描述BigCAT,一种针对口吃和非口吃成年人的沟通态度测试,(2)基于这些与言语相关态度测量的鉴别力信息,讨论BigCAT和埃里克森S -24的比较数据,(3)认识到性别对BigCAT或埃里克森S -24的结果均无显著影响。

相似文献

1
A comparative investigation of the BigCAT and Erickson S-24 measures of speech-associated attitude.关于言语相关态度的BigCAT测量法与埃里克森S - 24测量法的对比研究。
J Commun Disord. 2012 Sep-Oct;45(5):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
2
The BigCAT: a normative and comparative investigation of the communication attitude of nonstuttering and stuttering adults.大CAT:非口吃和口吃成年人沟通态度的规范性和比较性调查。
J Commun Disord. 2011 Mar-Apr;44(2):200-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
3
Reliability, validity, and normative investigation of the Persian version of the Communication Attitude Test for Adults Who Stutter (BigCAT).口吃成人沟通态度测试波斯语版本(BigCAT)的信度、效度及常模研究
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020 Jan-Feb;27(1):44-48. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2018.1480482. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
A comparative investigation of the speech-associated coping responses reported by adults who do and do not stutter.对有口吃和无口吃成年人所报告的与言语相关的应对反应的比较调查。
J Fluency Disord. 2004;29(3):237-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.07.001.
5
A comparative investigation of the speech-associated attitude of preschool and kindergarten children who do and do not stutter.一项针对有口吃和无口吃问题的学龄前儿童及幼儿园儿童言语相关态度的对比调查。
J Fluency Disord. 2005;30(4):307-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
6
Communication attitude of Kannada-speaking adults who do and do not stutter.有口吃和无口吃的卡纳达语成年者的沟通态度。
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Dec;70:105866. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105866. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
The accuracy with which adults who do not stutter predict stuttering-related communication attitudes.不口吃的成年人对口吃相关交流态度的预测准确性。
J Fluency Disord. 2011 Dec;36(4):334-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
8
Behavior Assessment Battery: Normative and Psychometric Investigation Among Polish Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter.行为评估电池:波兰口吃和非口吃成年人的常模和心理测量学研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1224-1234. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0187.
9
Investigating the inner speech of people who stutter: evidence for (and against) the covert repair hypothesis.探究口吃者的内心言语:支持(及反对)隐性修复假说的证据
J Commun Disord. 2011 Mar-Apr;44(2):246-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
10
Life partners' perceptions of the emotional, speech disruptive, and attitudinal correlates of stuttering.生活伴侣对口吃的情绪、言语障碍和态度相关因素的看法。
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Mar;67:105821. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105821. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Altered Modulation of Silent Period in Tongue Motor Cortex of Persistent Developmental Stuttering in Relation to Stuttering Severity.持续性发育性口吃患者舌运动皮层静息期的改变与口吃严重程度的关系
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 6;11(10):e0163959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163959. eCollection 2016.