Suppr超能文献

四种大型卡车技术的防撞潜力。

Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies.

机构信息

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1005 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.033. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this paper was to estimate the maximum potential large truck crash reductions in the United States associated with each of four crash avoidance technologies: side view assist, forward collision warning/mitigation, lane departure warning/prevention, and vehicle stability control. Estimates accounted for limitations of current systems.

METHODS

Crash records were extracted from the 2004-08 files of the National Automotive Sampling System General Estimates System (NASS GES) and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Crash descriptors such as location of damage on the vehicle, road characteristics, time of day, and precrash maneuvers were reviewed to determine whether the information or action provided by each technology potentially could have prevented the crash.

RESULTS

Of the four technologies, side view assist had the greatest potential for preventing large truck crashes of any severity; the technology is potentially applicable to 39,000 crashes in the United States each year, including 2000 serious and moderate injury crashes and 79 fatal crashes. Vehicle stability control is another promising technology, with the potential to prevent or mitigate up to 31,000 crashes per year including more serious crashes--up to 7000 moderate-to-serious injury crashes and 439 fatal crashes per year. Vehicle stability control could prevent or mitigate up to 20 and 11 percent of moderate-to-serious injury and fatal large truck crashes, respectively. Forward collision warning has the potential to prevent as many as 31,000 crashes per year, including 3000 serious and moderate injury crashes and 115 fatal crashes. Finally, 10,000 large truck crashes annually were relevant to lane departure warning/prevention systems. Of these, 1000 involved serious and moderate injuries and 247 involved fatal injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

There is great potential effectiveness for truck-based crash avoidance systems. However, it is yet to be determined how drivers will interact with the systems. Actual effectiveness of crash avoidance systems will not be known until sufficient real-world experience has been gained.

摘要

目的

本文旨在估计美国四项防撞避撞技术(侧视辅助、前方碰撞预警/缓解、车道偏离预警/预防和车辆稳定性控制)各自最大的潜在大型卡车事故减少量。这些估计考虑到了当前系统的局限性。

方法

从国家汽车抽样系统综合估计系统(NASS GES)和致命事故报告系统(FARS)的 2004-08 年档案中提取了事故记录。审查了车辆上的损伤位置、道路特征、一天中的时间和碰撞前操作等事故描述符,以确定每项技术提供的信息或操作是否有可能防止事故发生。

结果

在这四项技术中,侧视辅助技术具有防止任何严重程度的大型卡车事故的最大潜力;该技术在美国每年潜在适用于 39000 起事故,包括 2000 起严重和中度受伤事故和 79 起致命事故。车辆稳定性控制是另一种有前途的技术,每年有潜力预防或减轻多达 31000 起事故,包括更严重的事故——每年多达 7000 起中度至严重受伤事故和 439 起致命事故。车辆稳定性控制可以预防或减轻分别高达 20%和 11%的中度至严重伤害和致命大型卡车事故。前方碰撞预警每年有潜力预防多达 31000 起事故,包括 3000 起严重和中度受伤事故和 115 起致命事故。最后,每年有 10000 起大型卡车事故与车道偏离预警/预防系统相关。其中,1000 起涉及严重和中度受伤,247 起涉及致命受伤。

结论

基于卡车的防撞避撞系统具有很大的潜在有效性。然而,驾驶员将如何与这些系统互动仍有待确定。只有在获得足够的实际经验后,才能了解防撞避撞系统的实际有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验