• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用国家碰撞数据库的当前主动安全系统的综合目标人群。

Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases.

机构信息

a Virginia Tech , School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences , Blacksburg , Virginia.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):753-61. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.871003.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2013.871003
PMID:24433115
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of active safety systems is to prevent or mitigate collisions. A critical component in the design of active safety systems is the identification of the target population for a proposed system. The target population for an active safety system is that set of crashes that a proposed system could prevent or mitigate. Target crashes have scenarios in which the sensors and algorithms would likely activate. For example, the rear-end crash scenario, where the front of one vehicle contacts another vehicle traveling in the same direction and in the same lane as the striking vehicle, is one scenario for which forward collision warning (FCW) would be most effective in mitigating or preventing. This article presents a novel set of precrash scenarios based on coded variables from NHTSA's nationally representative crash databases in the United States.

METHODS

Using 4 databases (National Automotive Sampling System-General Estimates System [NASS-GES], NASS Crashworthiness Data System [NASS-CDS], Fatality Analysis Reporting System [FARS], and National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey [NMVCCS]) the scenarios developed in this study can be used to quantify the number of police-reported crashes, seriously injured occupants, and fatalities that are applicable to proposed active safety systems. In this article, we use the precrash scenarios to identify the target populations for FCW, pedestrian crash avoidance systems (PCAS), lane departure warning (LDW), and vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) or vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) systems. Crash scenarios were derived using precrash variables (critical event, accident type, precrash movement) present in all 4 data sources.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This study found that these active safety systems could potentially mitigate approximately 1 in 5 of all severity and serious injury crashes in the United States and 26 percent of fatal crashes. Annually, this corresponds to 1.2 million all severity, 14,353 serious injury (MAIS 3+), and 7412 fatal crashes. In addition, we provide the source code for the crash scenarios as an appendix (see online supplement) to this article so that researchers can use the crash scenarios in future research.

摘要

目的

主动安全系统的目的是预防或减轻碰撞。主动安全系统设计的一个关键组成部分是确定拟议系统的目标人群。主动安全系统的目标人群是指拟议系统可以预防或减轻的碰撞集。目标碰撞具有传感器和算法可能激活的场景。例如,追尾碰撞场景,其中一辆车的前部与另一辆在与撞击车辆相同方向和同一车道行驶的车辆接触,是前方碰撞警告(FCW)最有效地减轻或预防的一种情况。本文提出了一组基于美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)全国代表性碰撞数据库中编码变量的新型预碰撞场景。

方法

使用 4 个数据库(国家汽车抽样系统-一般估计系统[NASS-GES]、NASS 碰撞数据系统[NASS-CDS]、伤亡分析报告系统[FARS]和国家机动车碰撞因果调查系统[NMVCCS]),本研究开发的场景可用于量化适用于拟议主动安全系统的警察报告碰撞、重伤乘客和死亡人数。在本文中,我们使用预碰撞场景来确定 FCW、行人防撞系统(PCAS)、车道偏离警告(LDW)和车对车(V2V)或车对基础设施(V2I)系统的目标人群。碰撞场景是使用所有 4 个数据源中存在的预碰撞变量(关键事件、事故类型、预碰撞运动)得出的。

结果与结论

本研究发现,这些主动安全系统可能潜在地减轻美国约五分之一的所有严重程度和严重伤害碰撞,以及 26%的致命碰撞。每年,这对应于 120 万次所有严重程度、14353 次严重伤害(MAIS 3+)和 7412 次致命碰撞。此外,我们在本文的附录(见在线补充)中提供了碰撞场景的源代码,以便研究人员在未来的研究中使用这些碰撞场景。

相似文献

1
Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases.利用国家碰撞数据库的当前主动安全系统的综合目标人群。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):753-61. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.871003.
2
Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.量产前碰撞和车道偏离预警系统预期的碰撞减少及伤害降低情况比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S109-14. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1063619.
3
Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies.四种大型卡车技术的防撞潜力。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.033. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
4
Potential occupant injury reduction in the U.S. vehicle fleet for lane departure warning-equipped vehicles in single-vehicle crashes.在美国单车碰撞事故中,配备车道偏离预警系统的车辆对驾乘人员潜在伤害的降低情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S157-64. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.922684.
5
Forward collision warning system impact.前方碰撞预警系统影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S78-S83. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1490020. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
6
Effectiveness of the revision to FMVSS 301: FARS and NASS-CDS analysis of fatalities and severe injuries in rear impacts.FMVSS 301 修订版的有效性:FARS 和 NASS-CDS 对后碰撞中死亡和重伤的分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Apr;89:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.从驾驶员性别和年龄的角度来看道路安全与事故频率和道路场景的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.794943.
8
Factors contributing to serious and fatal injuries in belted rear seat occupants in frontal crashes.导致正面碰撞中安全带后排座椅乘客重伤和死亡的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S84-S91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1601182.
9
Evaluating the Potential Benefits of Advanced Automatic Crash Notification.评估先进自动碰撞通知的潜在益处。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):156-164. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001473. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
IIHS side crash test ratings and occupant death risk in real-world crashes.IIHS 侧面碰撞测试评级与现实碰撞中的乘员死亡风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):500-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.585671.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating multilevel cognitive processing within error-free and error-prone feedback conditions in executed and observed car driving.在执行和观察汽车驾驶过程中,研究无错误和易出错反馈条件下的多层次认知加工。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 27;18:1383956. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1383956. eCollection 2024.
2
Farm Vehicle Following Distance Estimation Using Deep Learning and Monocular Camera Images.基于深度学习和单目相机图像的农用车辆跟车距离估计
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 2;22(7):2736. doi: 10.3390/s22072736.
3
Use, perceptions, and benefits of automotive technologies among aging drivers.
老年驾驶员对汽车技术的使用、认知及益处
Inj Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;3(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40621-016-0093-4. Epub 2016 Dec 19.