The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Department of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012 Jul;25(3):450-70. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05041-11.
Combination antibiotic therapy for invasive infections with Gram-negative bacteria is employed in many health care facilities, especially for certain subgroups of patients, including those with neutropenia, those with infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, those with ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the severely ill. An argument can be made for empiric combination therapy, as we are witnessing a rise in infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. The wisdom of continued combination therapy after an organism is isolated and antimicrobial susceptibility data are known, however, is more controversial. The available evidence suggests that the greatest benefit of combination antibiotic therapy stems from the increased likelihood of choosing an effective agent during empiric therapy, rather than exploitation of in vitro synergy or the prevention of resistance during definitive treatment. In this review, we summarize the available data comparing monotherapy versus combination antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infections with Gram-negative bacteria.
在许多医疗机构中,采用联合抗生素治疗革兰氏阴性菌侵袭性感染,特别是对于某些特定亚组患者,包括中性粒细胞减少症患者、铜绿假单胞菌感染患者、呼吸机相关性肺炎患者和重症患者。鉴于多药耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起的感染不断增加,我们可以采用经验性联合治疗。然而,在分离出病原体并获得抗菌药物敏感性数据后,是否继续采用联合治疗则更具争议性。现有证据表明,联合抗生素治疗的最大益处源自经验性治疗中更有可能选择有效药物,而不是利用体外协同作用或在确定性治疗中预防耐药性。在本综述中,我们总结了比较单药治疗与联合抗菌治疗治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染的现有数据。