• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德语版 APHAB 的临床应用结果]

[Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB].

作者信息

Löhler J, Moser L, Heinrich D, Hörmann K, Walther L E

机构信息

Wissenschaftliches Institut für angewandte HNO-Heilkunde, Deutscher Berufsverband der HNO-Ärzte e. V., Maienbeeck 1, Bad Bramstedt, Germany.

出版信息

HNO. 2012 Jul;60(7):626-36. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2466-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00106-011-2466-x
PMID:22763767
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Speech audiometry studies do not deliver structured testimony of patients as to the actual benefit of hearing aids based on individual daily life experiences. This deficiency can be resolved by applying structured inventory questionnaires. The APHAB (German version) is an evaluated inventory questionnaire consisting of six questions put to patients with hearing deficiencies with and without hearing aids in four different hearing situations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected the APHAB data of 560 patients before and after fitting hearing aids. We also gathered personal data as to age, prior experience with hearing aids, duration of daily use of the hearing aid and degree of hearing loss.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was a little under 70 years, 84% had just received their first hearing aid, and 83% exhibited moderate or severe hearing loss. The APHAB results were classified in percentile and contingency tables. The latter allow one to determine conditional probabilities of the potential success of fitting a hearing aid to a new patient for each APHAB scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The APHAB can be applied regularly to measure the benefit of fitting a hearing aid to a patient in particular in problematic hearing situations. By registering the personal view of the patients, it expands the scope of the standard methods (e.g., speech audiometry) so that the quality of diagnostics and therapy can be improved. It qualitatively records the success of hearing aid fitting, predicts potential problem areas and thereby may reduce the number of unused hearing aids.

摘要

目的

言语测听研究无法根据患者的个人日常生活经历提供关于助听器实际益处的结构化证词。通过应用结构化调查问卷可以解决这一缺陷。APHAB(德文版)是一种经过评估的调查问卷,由六个问题组成,针对有听力缺陷且佩戴或未佩戴助听器的患者在四种不同听力情况下进行询问。

材料与方法

我们收集了560名患者在佩戴助听器前后的APHAB数据。我们还收集了关于年龄、先前使用助听器的经历、助听器每日使用时长以及听力损失程度的个人数据。

结果

患者的平均年龄略低于70岁,84%的患者刚佩戴第一台助听器,83%的患者表现为中度或重度听力损失。APHAB结果按百分位数和列联表进行分类。后者可以让人们针对每个APHAB量表确定为新患者佩戴助听器潜在成功的条件概率。

结论

APHAB可以定期应用于衡量为患者佩戴助听器的益处,特别是在听力有问题的情况下。通过记录患者的个人观点,它扩展了标准方法(如言语测听)的范围,从而可以提高诊断和治疗的质量。它定性地记录了助听器佩戴的成功情况,预测潜在问题区域,从而可能减少未使用助听器的数量。

相似文献

1
[Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB].[德语版 APHAB 的临床应用结果]
HNO. 2012 Jul;60(7):626-36. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2466-x.
2
[APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].[用于助听器验配益处个体评估的APHAB评分]
HNO. 2017 Nov;65(11):901-909. doi: 10.1007/s00106-017-0350-z.
3
[Development and use of an APHAB database].[一个APHAB数据库的开发与应用]
HNO. 2014 Oct;62(10):735-45. doi: 10.1007/s00106-014-2915-4.
4
[Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].[助听器对单音节测试成绩及日常主观听力的影响]
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):595-600. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0143-9.
5
[Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice. Part 2: New diagnostic aspects of speech audiometry].[日常实践中助听器验配新质量保证协议的实施。第2部分:言语测听的新诊断要点]
HNO. 2014 Sep;62(9):667-81; quiz 682. doi: 10.1007/s00106-014-2880-y.
6
Comparing Self-Fitting Strategies for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Crossover Clinical Trial.比较非处方助听器的自适配策略:一项交叉临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2007.
7
[Hearing aid fitting: Effect of doubling the standard rate on compliance, quality of results, and excess payments].[助听器验配:标准费用翻倍对依从性、结果质量及超额支付的影响]
HNO. 2015 Dec;63(12):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00106-015-0081-y.
8
[Distribution and Scattering of APHAB Answers Before and After Hearing Aid Fitting].[助听器验配前后APHAB问卷答案的分布与离散情况]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2016 Nov;95(11):768-773. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107561. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).助听器效益简易量表(APHAB)的敏感性和特异性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;274(10):3593-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4680-y. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
10
Evaluation of the Self-Fitting Process with a Commercially Available Hearing Aid.使用市售助听器对自适配过程的评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Feb;28(2):109-118. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15076.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing loss, depression, and cognition in younger and older adult CI candidates.年轻及老年人工耳蜗植入候选者的听力损失、抑郁与认知
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 13;14:1272210. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1272210. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners.大量自我报告听力正常的成年听众队列中言语、空间及听力质量量表(SSQ)与助听器益处简要概况问卷(APHAB)的比较
Audiol Res. 2023 Feb 10;13(1):143-150. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13010014.
3
[Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].

本文引用的文献

1
[The use of the German APHAB for quality control in hearing aid fitting in an ENT-office. Comparison of our results with the given US-norm].[在耳鼻喉科诊所使用德国APHAB进行助听器验配的质量控制。将我们的结果与给定的美国标准进行比较]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Dec;89(12):737-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1261891. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
2
[The advantage of multidisciplinary treatment of presbycusis].
Soins Gerontol. 2010 Jul-Aug(84):12-6.
3
Auditory training: assessment of the benefit of hearing aids in elderly individuals.听觉训练:评估助听器对老年人的益处。
[APHAB问卷与弗赖堡单音节测试在无噪声和有噪声情况下的相关性]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2022 Apr;101(4):304-309. doi: 10.1055/a-1528-7555. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
[Possibilities to predict the success of an individual hearing aid fitting using the APHAB].[利用APHAB预测个体助听器验配成功的可能性]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2022 Mar;101(3):206-215. doi: 10.1055/a-1337-3325. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-Speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives.指南“植入式助听器” - 简短版本:德语区听力学专家、神经耳科医生和耳科医生工作组(ADANO)、德国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(DGHNO)与德国听力学学会(DGA)、德国语音治疗与儿童听力学学会(DGPP)以及患者代表合作制定的德国S2k指南 。
HNO. 2018 Jul;66(Suppl 2):71-76. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0533-2.
6
Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.有源中耳听力植入设备的最低报告标准。
Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(2):105-115. doi: 10.1159/000490878. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
[Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives].[《植入式助听器指南》-简短版本:德语区听力学专家、神经耳科医生和耳科医生工作组(ADANO)、德国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(DGHNO)与德国听力学学会(DGA)、德国言语治疗与儿童听力学学会(DGPP)以及患者代表合作制定的德国S2k指南]
HNO. 2018 Sep;66(9):654-659. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0531-4.
8
[Dependency of APHAB score in the EC subscale on age, gender and subjective hearing loss : Hearing aid fitting in two subjective hearing loss groups].[EC子量表中APHAB评分与年龄、性别及主观听力损失的相关性:两个主观听力损失组的助听器适配]
HNO. 2018 Jul;66(7):550-558. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0500-y.
9
Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.助听器:适应症、技术、适配及质量控制。
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 18;16:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/cto000147. eCollection 2017.
10
Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).助听器效益简易量表(APHAB)的敏感性和特异性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;274(10):3593-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4680-y. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
Pro Fono. 2010 Apr-Jun;22(2):101-6. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872010000200006.
4
[The 'dizziness handicap inventory': initial psychometric evaluation of the German version].
Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Jul;89(7):418-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1253371. Epub 2010 May 3.
5
Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.开发 WDRC 助听器的 APHAB 标准,并与原始标准进行比较。
Ear Hear. 2010 Feb;31(1):47-55. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b8397c.
6
BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.BKB-SIN和ANL可预测人工耳蜗使用者的感知沟通能力。
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):401-10. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a16379.
7
The association between hearing status and psychosocial health before the age of 70 years: results from an internet-based national survey on hearing.70岁之前听力状况与心理社会健康之间的关联:一项基于互联网的全国听力调查结果
Ear Hear. 2009 Jun;30(3):302-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819c6e01.
8
[Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].[使用新型人工耳蜗言语处理器提高言语理解能力]
HNO. 2009 Jun;57(6):567-74. doi: 10.1007/s00106-008-1781-3.
9
[Hearing aids in the elderly. Why is the accommodation so difficult?].[老年人使用助听器。为何适应如此困难?]
HNO. 2004 Apr;52(4):321-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-004-1058-4.
10
[Speech audiometry and new word-tests].[言语测听法与新的词汇测试]
Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1953;162(5):394-431.