D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Int J Biometeorol. 2013 May;57(3):437-50. doi: 10.1007/s00484-012-0569-z. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
It is widely assumed that tree cavity structure and microclimate affect cavity selection and use in cavity-dwelling bats and birds. Despite the interest in tree structure and microclimate, the relationship between the two has rarely been quantified. Currently available data often comes from artificial structures that may not accurately represent conditions in natural cavities. We collected data on tree cavity structure and microclimate from 45 trees in five cypress-gum swamps in the Coastal Plain of Georgia in the United States in 2008. We used hierarchical linear models to predict cavity microclimate from tree structure and ambient temperature and humidity, and used Aikaike's information criterion to select the most parsimonious models. We found large differences in microclimate among trees, but tree structure variables explained <28% of the variation, while ambient conditions explained >80% of variation common to all trees. We argue that the determinants of microclimate are complex and multidimensional, and therefore cavity microclimate cannot be deduced easily from simple tree structures. Furthermore, we found that daily fluctuations in ambient conditions strongly affect microclimate, indicating that greater weather fluctuations will cause greater differences among tree cavities.
人们普遍认为,树洞结构和小气候会影响树洞栖蝙蝠和鸟类对树洞的选择和利用。尽管人们对树木结构和小气候很感兴趣,但这两者之间的关系很少被量化。目前可用的数据通常来自于人工结构,这些结构可能无法准确反映天然树洞中树洞的条件。我们于 2008 年从美国乔治亚州沿海平原的五个柏-桉树沼泽地中的 45 棵树中收集了树洞结构和小气候的数据。我们使用分层线性模型来预测树洞微气候与树木结构和环境温度和湿度的关系,并使用赤池信息量准则选择最简约的模型。我们发现树木之间的小气候存在很大差异,但树木结构变量仅解释了 28%的差异,而环境条件解释了所有树木共有的 80%以上的变化。我们认为,小气候的决定因素是复杂的和多方面的,因此不能简单地从树木结构来推断树洞的微气候。此外,我们发现环境条件的日常波动强烈影响小气候,这表明更大的天气波动会导致树木之间的差异更大。