• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PPIs 对艰难梭菌感染的贡献有多大?

How much do PPIs contribute to C. difficile infections?

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1020-1. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.174.

DOI:10.1038/ajg.2012.174
PMID:22764024
Abstract

Two separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in this edition of the American Journal of Gastroenterology conclude that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is associated with an ~70% increase in the risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The two reviews employed different methodology but reached very similar conclusions. However, since the quality of evidence from the individual studies that were included in these analyses is relatively weak, their conclusions must be interpreted cautiously. Observational studies--and even well-conducted systematic reviews of observational studies--rarely provide adequate evidence to prove causality rather than mere association. However, given both the widespread use of PPIs and the increasing incidence and importance of CDI, it is important that this association is adequately explored.

摘要

本期《美国胃肠病学杂志》发表的两项独立的系统评价和荟萃分析得出结论,质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用与艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的风险增加约 70%有关。这两项综述采用了不同的方法,但得出了非常相似的结论。然而,由于纳入这些分析的个别研究的证据质量相对较弱,因此必须谨慎解释他们的结论。观察性研究——甚至是精心设计的观察性研究系统评价——很少提供足够的证据来证明因果关系,而不仅仅是关联。然而,鉴于质子泵抑制剂的广泛使用以及艰难梭菌感染的发病率和重要性不断增加,充分探讨这种相关性非常重要。

相似文献

1
How much do PPIs contribute to C. difficile infections?PPIs 对艰难梭菌感染的贡献有多大?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1020-1. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.174.
2
Does confounding explain the association between PPIs and Clostridium difficile-related diarrhea?混杂因素能否解释质子泵抑制剂与艰难梭菌相关性腹泻之间的关联?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;108(2):278-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.395.
3
Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis.抑酸药物和抗生素与艰难梭菌感染风险:荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1011-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.108. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
4
Proton pump inhibitor use may be associated with an increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection.
Evid Based Med. 2013 Oct;18(5):193-4. doi: 10.1136/eb-2012-101057. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
5
Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid-suppressive therapy; pitfalls in accurate estimation.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;108(2):277-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.394.
6
Response to Chandra et al., and Freedberg and Abrams.对钱德拉等人以及弗里德伯格和艾布拉姆斯的回应。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;108(2):279-80. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.397.
7
Association of Gastric Acid Suppression With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.胃酸抑制与艰难梭菌反复感染的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0212.
8
Proton pump inhibitors and risk of Clostridium difficile infection: association or causation?质子泵抑制剂与艰难梭菌感染风险:关联还是因果关系?
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;34(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000414.
9
Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and proton pump inhibitor therapy: a meta-analysis.艰难梭菌相关性腹泻与质子泵抑制剂治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1001-10. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.179. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
10
Proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists in the intensive care setting: focus on therapeutic and adverse events.重症监护环境中的质子泵抑制剂和组胺-2受体拮抗剂:关注治疗作用和不良事件。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015 Feb;14(2):269-80. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2015.986456. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Prevalence of Among Hospitalized Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.巴勒斯坦一家三级医疗医院住院患者的特征、风险因素及患病率。 (你提供的原文最后少了具体病症等关键信息,我按照完整的常见表述翻译了)
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Nov 9;14:4681-4688. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S333985. eCollection 2021.
2
Infection: An Epidemiology Update.感染:流行病学最新进展
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020 Mar;33(2):49-57. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701229. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Causes, Burden, and Prevention of Infection.感染的病因、负担及预防
Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md). 2015 May;23(6):281-288. doi: 10.1097/IPC.0000000000000331.
4
Proton Pump Inhibitors and Clostridium Difficile Infection: Are We Propagating an Already Rapidly Growing Healthcare Problem?质子泵抑制剂与艰难梭菌感染:我们是否在加剧一个已然迅速增长的医疗问题?
Gastroenterology Res. 2013 Oct;6(5):171-173. doi: 10.4021/gr575w. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
5
Use of Acid Suppression Medication is Associated With Risk for C. difficile Infection in Infants and Children: A Population-based Study.使用抑酸药物与婴幼儿艰难梭菌感染风险相关:一项基于人群的研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 15;61(6):912-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ432. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
6
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position statement: fecal microbiota transplant therapy.加拿大胃肠病学协会立场声明:粪便微生物群移植疗法
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;28(2):66-8. doi: 10.1155/2014/346590.
7
Proton pump inhibitors and risk of bone fractures.质子泵抑制剂与骨折风险
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;12(4):414-23. doi: 10.1007/s11938-014-0030-y.
8
Clostridium difficile infection in the community: are proton pump inhibitors to blame?社区获得性艰难梭菌感染:质子泵抑制剂是否是罪魁祸首?
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 28;19(40):6710-3. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6710.
9
Proton pump inhibitors and risk for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection among inpatients.质子泵抑制剂与住院患者中复发性艰难梭菌感染的风险。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1794-801. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.333. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
10
Comparison of different regimens of proton pump inhibitors for acute peptic ulcer bleeding.不同质子泵抑制剂方案治疗急性消化性溃疡出血的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 12;2013(6):CD007999. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007999.pub2.