• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Proton pump inhibitors and risk for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection among inpatients.质子泵抑制剂与住院患者中复发性艰难梭菌感染的风险。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1794-801. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.333. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
2
Proton Pump Inhibitors Do Not Increase Risk for Clostridium difficile Infection in the Intensive Care Unit.质子泵抑制剂不会增加重症监护病房艰难梭菌感染的风险。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1641-1648. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.343. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
3
Proton pump inhibitors and risk for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.质子泵抑制剂与艰难梭菌反复感染风险
Arch Intern Med. 2010 May 10;170(9):772-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.73.
4
Continuous Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy and the Associated Risk of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.连续质子泵抑制剂治疗与复发性艰难梭菌感染的相关风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):784-91. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.42.
5
Comparative risk of Clostridium difficile infection between proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists: A 15-year hospital cohort study using a common data model.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂治疗期间艰难梭菌感染风险的比较:使用通用数据模型的 15 年医院队列研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;35(8):1325-1330. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14983. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
6
Magnitude and direction of the association between Clostridium difficile infection and proton pump inhibitors in adults and pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.艰难梭菌感染与质子泵抑制剂在成人和儿科患者中的关联程度和方向:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;53(1):84-94. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1369-3. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
7
Effects of proton pump inhibitor use on risk of Clostridium difficile infection: a hospital cohort study.质子泵抑制剂使用与艰难梭菌感染风险的关系:一项医院队列研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;54(12):1052-1060. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01598-2. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
8
Predictors of Clostridioides difficile recurrence across a national cohort of veterans in outpatient, acute, and long-term care settings.预测门诊、急性和长期护理环境中全国退伍军人队列中艰难梭菌复发的因素。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Apr 17;76(9):581-590. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz032.
9
Incidence of Clostridium difficile infections in patients receiving antimicrobial and acid-suppression therapy.接受抗菌和抑酸治疗的患者中艰难梭菌感染的发生率。
Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Jul;31(7):642-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.7.642.
10
Vonoprazan poses no additional risk of developing Clostridioides difficile infection compared to proton pump inhibitors.与质子泵抑制剂相比,沃诺拉赞不会增加艰难梭菌感染的风险。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;38(6):940-947. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16169. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of the Adverse Effects of Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on the Gastrointestinal System in the Adult Population.长期使用质子泵抑制剂对成年人群胃肠道系统不良反应的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Aug 20;17(8):e90606. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90606. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Long-Term Vonoprazan and Acotiamide-Refractory Patients With Functional Dyspepsia Partly Exhibit Pancreatic Enzyme Abnormalities.长期使用沃克和阿考替胺治疗无效的功能性消化不良患者部分存在胰腺酶异常。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 28;16(9):e70371. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70371. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Leveraging multi-database linkages to assess racial and ethnic disparities among Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales cases in Tennessee, 2015-2019.利用多数据库联动评估2015 - 2019年田纳西州耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌病例中的种族和民族差异。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 2;45(10):1-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.86.
4
Infectious Inequity: How the Gut Microbiome and Social Determinants of Health May Contribute to Clostridioides difficile Infection Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities.传染性不公平:肠道微生物组和健康的社会决定因素如何导致少数族裔人群中艰难梭菌感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 5;77(Suppl 6):S455-S462. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad586.
5
First Clostridioides difficile Recurrence Is Highest Following Concomitant Antimicrobial Administration During and Within 30 Days of Treatment.首次艰难梭菌复发率在治疗期间及治疗后30天内同时使用抗菌药物的情况下最高。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Nov;68(11):4221-4229. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08091-0. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
6
Proton pump Inhibitors and Risk of Enteric Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Self-controlled Case Series.质子泵抑制剂与炎症性肠病肠道感染的风险:一项自身对照病例系列研究。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Jan 5;30(1):38-44. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad035.
7
Infection Treatment and Outcome Disparities in a National Sample of United States Hospitals.美国医院全国样本中的感染治疗与结果差异
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;11(9):1203. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091203.
8
Assessment of Prescriptions in Elderly Patients Hospitalized in Medicine Departments.内科住院老年患者处方评估
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):5343. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225343.
9
Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication and its correlates in elderly hospitalized patients: A cross-sectional study based on Beers criteria.老年住院患者潜在不适当用药情况及其相关因素:一项基于Beers标准的横断面研究
J Family Community Med. 2020 Sep-Dec;27(3):200-207. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_175_20. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
Incidence and Risk Factors of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Cirrhosis.肝硬化患者中复发性艰难梭菌感染的发生率和危险因素。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul;11(7):e00189. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000189.

本文引用的文献

1
Deriving comorbidities from medical records using natural language processing.利用自然语言处理从医疗记录中提取合并症。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Dec;20(e2):e239-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001889. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
2
Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections.艰难梭菌感染的诊断、治疗和预防指南。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;108(4):478-98; quiz 499. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.4. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
3
Reported side effects and complications of long-term proton pump inhibitor use: dissecting the evidence.长期使用质子泵抑制剂的报告副作用和并发症:剖析证据
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;11(5):458-64; quiz e37-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.031. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
4
An automated tool for detecting medication overuse based on the electronic health records.基于电子健康记录的药物滥用自动检测工具。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):183-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3387. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
5
How much do PPIs contribute to C. difficile infections?PPIs 对艰难梭菌感染的贡献有多大?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1020-1. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.174.
6
Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and proton pump inhibitor therapy: a meta-analysis.艰难梭菌相关性腹泻与质子泵抑制剂治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1001-10. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.179. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
7
Does doxycycline protect against development of Clostridium difficile infection?多西环素是否能预防艰难梭菌感染?
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(5):615-20. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis457. Epub 2012 May 4.
8
Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis.抑酸药物和抗生素与艰难梭菌感染风险:荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1011-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.108. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
9
Clostridium difficile of the ileum following total abdominal colectomy, with or without proctectomy: who is at risk?回肠艰难梭菌在全腹部结肠切除术(包括或不包括直肠切除术)后的情况:哪些人有风险?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Apr;55(4):424-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823f86a2.
10
Effect of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the gastrointestinal bacterial microbiota of healthy dogs.质子泵抑制剂奥美拉唑对健康犬胃肠道细菌菌群的影响。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Jun;80(3):624-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01331.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

质子泵抑制剂与住院患者中复发性艰难梭菌感染的风险。

Proton pump inhibitors and risk for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection among inpatients.

机构信息

Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1794-801. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.333. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1038/ajg.2013.333
PMID:24060760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3966060/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Observational studies suggest that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a risk factor for incident Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Data also suggest an association between PPIs and recurrent CDI, although large-scale studies focusing solely on hospitalized patients are lacking. We therefore performed a retrospective cohort analysis of inpatients with incident CDI to assess receipt of PPIs as a risk factor for CDI recurrence in this population.

METHODS

Using electronic medical records, we identified hospitalized adult patients between 1 December 2009 and 30 June 2012 with incident CDI, defined as a first positive stool test for C. difficile toxin B and who received appropriate treatment. Electronic records were parsed for clinical factors including receipt of PPIs, other acid suppression, non-CDI antibiotics, and comorbidities. The primary exposure was in-hospital PPIs given concurrently with C. difficile treatment. Recurrence was defined as a second positive stool test 15-90 days after the initial positive test. C. difficile recurrence rates in the PPI exposed and unexposed groups were compared with the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to control for demographics, comorbidities, and other clinical factors.

RESULTS

We identified 894 inpatients with incident CDI. The cumulative incidence of CDI recurrence in the cohort was 23%. Receipt of PPIs concurrent with CDI treatment was not associated with C. difficile recurrence (hazard ratio (HR)=0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.58-1.16). Black race (HR=1.66, 95% CI=1.05-2.63), increased age (HR=1.02, 95% CI=1.01-1.03), and increased comorbidities (HR=1.09, 95% CI=1.04-1.14) were associated with CDI recurrence. In light of a higher 90-day mortality seen among those who received PPIs (log-rank P=0.02), we also analyzed the subset of patients who survived to 90 days of follow-up. Again, there was no association between PPIs and CDI recurrence (HR=0.87; 95% CI=0.60-1.28). Finally, there was no association between recurrent CDI and increased duration or dose of PPIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Among hospitalized adults with C. difficile, receipt of PPIs concurrent with C. difficile treatment was not associated with CDI recurrence. Black race, increased age, and increased comorbidities significantly predicted recurrence. Future studies should test interventions to prevent CDI recurrence among high-risk inpatients.

摘要

目的

观察性研究表明质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的一个发病因素。数据还表明 PPI 与复发性 CDI 之间存在关联,尽管缺乏专门针对住院患者的大规模研究。因此,我们对患有 CDI 的住院患者进行了回顾性队列分析,以评估在该人群中 PPI 的使用是否是 CDI 复发的一个风险因素。

方法

使用电子病历,我们确定了 2009 年 12 月 1 日至 2012 年 6 月 30 日期间患有 CDI 的住院成年患者,其定义为首次粪便检测出艰难梭菌毒素 B 阳性且接受了适当治疗。对电子记录进行解析,以获取包括接受 PPI、其他抑酸剂、非 CDI 抗生素和合并症在内的临床因素。主要暴露因素为在接受艰难梭菌治疗时同时使用 PPI。复发定义为初次阳性检测后 15-90 天的第二次阳性粪便检测。用对数秩检验比较 PPI 暴露组和未暴露组的 CDI 复发率。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型来控制人口统计学、合并症和其他临床因素。

结果

我们确定了 894 例患有 CDI 的住院患者。该队列中 CDI 复发的累积发生率为 23%。在接受 CDI 治疗时同时使用 PPI 与艰难梭菌复发无关(风险比(HR)=0.82;95%置信区间(CI)=0.58-1.16)。黑人种族(HR=1.66,95%CI=1.05-2.63)、年龄增加(HR=1.02,95%CI=1.01-1.03)和合并症增加(HR=1.09,95%CI=1.04-1.14)与 CDI 复发相关。鉴于接受 PPI 治疗的患者中 90 天死亡率较高(对数秩检验 P=0.02),我们还分析了存活至 90 天随访的患者亚组。同样,PPI 与 CDI 复发之间没有关联(HR=0.87;95%CI=0.60-1.28)。最后,PPIs 的使用时间或剂量与复发性 CDI 之间没有关联。

结论

在患有艰难梭菌的住院成人中,在接受艰难梭菌治疗时同时使用 PPI 与 CDI 复发无关。黑人种族、年龄增加和合并症增加显著预测了复发。未来的研究应该测试预防高危住院患者 CDI 复发的干预措施。