• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗附件良性疾病的疼痛比较:一项单中心随机对照研究。

Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sorlandet Hospital Health Authority, Kristiansand, Norway.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):973-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.016
PMID:22769732
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) results in less postoperative pain and a better cosmetic surgical scar compared with conventional laparoscopy.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

A county hospital in Norway.

PATIENT(S): Forty women with benign adnexal disease or a hereditary cancer risk scheduled for laparoscopic adnexal surgery.

INTERVENTION(S): LESS or conventional laparoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Postoperative pain 24 hours after surgery.

RESULT(S): There was no difference in pain at 24 hours after surgery, with a mean score of 3.0 (SD 2.1) in the LESS group and 2.5 (SD 1.5) in the conventional laparoscopy group. Significantly more shoulder tip pain was reported by women undergoing LESS compared with those having conventional surgery at 6 and 24 hours after surgery. A high satisfaction with the cosmetic result was reported in both groups, with no significant difference in the Manchester scar scale score.

CONCLUSION(S): Although similar levels of postoperative pain are experienced by women having LESS and conventional laparoscopic surgery, women having LESS report significantly more shoulder tip pain compared to those having conventional laparoscopic surgery. This may relate to a significantly longer operation time in the LESS group.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01288599.

摘要

目的

比较经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(LESS)与传统腹腔镜手术治疗附件良性疾病或遗传性癌风险患者的术后疼痛和美容切口效果。

设计

前瞻性随机对照试验。

地点

挪威某县医院。

患者

40 例拟行腹腔镜附件手术的良性附件疾病或遗传性癌风险患者。

干预措施

LESS 或传统腹腔镜手术。

主要观察指标

术后 24 小时的疼痛程度。

结果

两组术后 24 小时的疼痛评分无差异,LESS 组平均评分为 3.0(SD 2.1),传统腹腔镜组为 2.5(SD 1.5)。术后 6 小时和 24 小时,行 LESS 手术的患者肩部疼痛明显多于行传统腹腔镜手术的患者。两组患者对美容效果均非常满意,曼彻斯特瘢痕量表评分无显著差异。

结论

LESS 与传统腹腔镜手术患者的术后疼痛程度相似,但行 LESS 手术的患者肩部疼痛明显多于行传统腹腔镜手术的患者,可能与 LESS 组手术时间较长有关。

临床试验注册号

NCT01288599。

相似文献

1
Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗附件良性疾病的疼痛比较:一项单中心随机对照研究。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):973-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
2
Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.单孔腹腔镜附件手术是否比传统腹腔镜手术疼痛更轻?术后疼痛与手术结果的比较。
Surg Innov. 2013 Feb;20(1):46-54. doi: 10.1177/1553350612439632. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
3
Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial.妇科腹腔镜检查中辅助端口尺寸的最小化:一项随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):480-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.09.002.
4
Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial.传统腹腔镜和经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(LESS)治疗附件良性疾病的术后疼痛:一项随机试验。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):255-259.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 11.
5
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for treatment of benign adnexal disease: single-center experience over 3-years.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(LESS)治疗附件良性疾病:3 年单中心经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.07.002.
6
Single-port access compared with three-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery in a randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜附件手术与三孔腹腔镜附件手术的随机对照试验
J Int Med Res. 2013 Jun;41(3):673-80. doi: 10.1177/0300060513484437. Epub 2013 May 7.
7
Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在附件良性疾病患者中的应用。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):2074.e7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.034. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
8
Does single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy mean reduced pain? A retrospective cohort analysis between SPA and conventional laparoscopy.单孔腹腔镜是否意味着减轻疼痛?单孔与传统腹腔镜的回顾性队列分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 May;162(1):71-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
9
Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes.单孔腹腔镜附件手术与传统腹腔镜附件手术:围手术期结局比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Aug;151(2):181-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
10
Hybrid Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Using a 2-mm Mini-Laparoscopic Instrument versus Conventional Three-Port Laparoscopy for Gynecologic Adnexal Diseases: A Prospective Randomized Trial.采用 2mm 迷你腹腔镜器械的杂交腹腔镜单孔手术与传统三孔腹腔镜用于妇科附件疾病:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(5):495-502. doi: 10.1159/000499912. Epub 2019 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in adnexectomy: A systematic review and metaanalysis of surgical outcome.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术在附件切除术中的比较分析:手术结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar 10;22(1):83-95. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2025.09804.
2
Effect of two different laparoscopic techniques on post-operative wound complications in patients with benign gynaecological diseases: A meta-analysis.两种不同腹腔镜技术对妇科良性疾病患者术后伤口并发症的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct 13;21(2). doi: 10.1111/iwj.14382.
3
Comparison of efficacy of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic treatment for uterine leiomyoma: a latest meta-analysis.
单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效比较:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 2;13:1192582. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1192582. eCollection 2023.
4
Early return to work: Single-port vs. multiport laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumor.早期重返工作岗位:单孔与多孔腹腔镜手术治疗良性卵巢肿瘤
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 8;9:1005898. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005898. eCollection 2022.
5
Residual intraperitoneal carbon dioxide gas following laparoscopy for adnexal masses: Residual gas volume assessment and postoperative outcome analysis.腹腔镜附件包块切除术后腹腔内残余二氧化碳气体:残余气量评估与术后转归分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30142. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030142.
6
Perioperative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site extracorporeal versus intracorporeal cystectomy for benign ovarian cysts: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.腹腔镜单孔体外与体内良性卵巢囊肿切除术的围手术期结局:一项基于倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Dec;9(23):1725. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-5625.
7
Time Characteristics of Shoulder Pain after Laparoscopic Surgery.腹腔镜手术后肩部疼痛的时间特征。
JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00027.
8
The role of port site local anesthetic injection in laparoendoscopic single site surgery: a prospective randomized study.端口部位局部麻醉注射在腹腔镜单孔手术中的作用:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 May;63(3):387-394. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.387. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性卵巢肿块的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e032331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032331.
10
Comparison between Laparoendoscopic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Mature Cystic Teratoma of the Ovary.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗成熟性卵巢囊性畸胎瘤的比较
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2019 Oct 24;8(4):155-159. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_3_19. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.