Fadaizadeh Lida, Tamadon Ronak, Saeedfar Kayvan, Jamaati Hamid Reza
Telemedicine Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012 Jun;50(2):59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Nowadays, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems have drawn much attention for the evaluation and prediction of disease process in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). To use these scoring tools, their predicting power must be initially validated for the target patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of these two scoring systems in an ICU for respiratory diseases in Iran.
All records of patients admitted during a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed, and the APACHE II and SAPS II scores were calculated accordingly. Information gathering was performed using a questionnaire.
A total of 415 records were used. The mean age of patients was 49.28 ± 0.94 years. Using receiver operating-characteristic curve, cutoff points for 80% sensitivity and specificity of mortality prediction for APACHE and SAPS scores were 13.5 and 27.5, respectively. Calibration and discrimination studies indicated an acceptable status for both scales, but APACHE II scoring system seemed to show rewarding outcomes.
Results indicate that APACHE II scoring system can be considered as a reliable method for predicting mortality in our referral respiratory ICU.
背景/目的:如今,急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)评分系统在重症监护病房(ICU)患者疾病进程的评估和预测方面备受关注。要使用这些评分工具,必须首先针对目标患者验证其预测能力。本研究旨在评估这两种评分系统在伊朗一家呼吸疾病ICU中的性能。
回顾性分析了1年内收治患者的所有记录,并据此计算APACHE II和SAPS II评分。使用问卷进行信息收集。
共使用了415份记录。患者的平均年龄为49.28±0.94岁。使用受试者工作特征曲线,APACHE和SAPS评分预测死亡率的80%敏感性和特异性的截断点分别为13.5和27.5。校准和鉴别研究表明两种量表的状况均可接受,但APACHE II评分系统似乎显示出更理想的结果。
结果表明,APACHE II评分系统可被视为预测我们转诊呼吸ICU患者死亡率的可靠方法。