OptumInsight, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1788-802. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
Dronedarone is a therapy for the treatment of patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. According to results in the ATHENA trial, dronedarone on top of standard of care (SOC) decreases the risk of cardiovascular hospitalizations or death by 24% compared with SOC alone.
A patient-level health economic model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dronedarone on top of SOC versus SOC alone.
The risk of experiencing stroke, congestive heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, treatment discontinuation, and death was modeled by separate health states, whereas adverse events were included as 1-time cost and utility decrements. State transition probabilities were primarily deduced from the patient-level data from ATHENA using survival analysis. Four sets of analyses were performed to reflect costs and treatment effects in Canada, Italy, Sweden, and Switzerland. Cost-effectiveness analysis was also conducted in a newly defined patient population identified by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to avoid the use of dronedarone in permanent AF patients resembling those in the PALLAS study.
The predicted survival time was, for the Canadian cohort, extended from 10.11 to 10.24 years when dronedarone was added to SOC. Similar results were found for the other countries, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of €5828, €5873, €14,970, and €8554 per QALYs for Canada, Italy, Sweden, and, Switzerland, respectively. These results are all well below current established cost-effectiveness thresholds. In the EMA-restricted population, all patients were predicted to live longer, and the ICER increased but remained within established thresholds, with an average cost per QALY gained of €15,900.
Dronedarone on top of SOC appears to be a cost-effective treatment for atrial fibrillation compared with SOC alone. Despite the differences in the local settings considered, the results were consistent among all the countries included in the study. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00174785.
多非利特是阵发性和持续性心房颤动或心房扑动患者的治疗选择。根据 ATHENA 试验结果,与单独标准治疗(SOC)相比,多非利特联合 SOC 可使心血管住院或死亡风险降低 24%。
开发了一种患者水平的健康经济学模型,以评估多非利特联合 SOC 与 SOC 单独治疗的成本效益。
通过单独的健康状态来建模发生中风、充血性心力衰竭、急性冠状动脉综合征、治疗中断和死亡的风险,而将不良反应作为一次性成本和效用降低因素纳入。状态转移概率主要根据 ATHENA 中的患者水平数据使用生存分析得出。进行了四组分析,以反映加拿大、意大利、瑞典和瑞士的成本和治疗效果。还在欧洲药品管理局(EMA)确定的新患者人群中进行了成本效益分析,以避免在类似于 PALLAS 研究的永久性房颤患者中使用多非利特。
对于加拿大队列,当多非利特联合 SOC 治疗时,预测的生存时间从 10.11 年延长至 10.24 年。在其他国家也发现了类似的结果,导致加拿大、意大利、瑞典和瑞士的增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为每 QALY 5828 欧元、5873 欧元、14970 欧元和 8554 欧元。这些结果均远低于当前既定的成本效益阈值。在 EMA 限制的人群中,所有患者的预期寿命都延长了,ICER 增加,但仍在既定阈值内,每获得一个 QALY 的平均成本为 15900 欧元。
与 SOC 单独治疗相比,SOC 联合多非利特治疗心房颤动似乎是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。尽管考虑了不同的当地情况,但研究中纳入的所有国家的结果都是一致的。临床试验编号:NCT00174785。