• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同期门静脉和动脉再灌注对肝内胆管树的保护:前瞻性随机初步研究结果。

Protection of the intrahepatic biliary tree by contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion: results of a prospective randomized pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2012 Sep;64(3):173-7. doi: 10.1007/s13304-012-0164-1. Epub 2012 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-012-0164-1
PMID:22773391
Abstract

Sequential portal and arterial revascularization (SPAr) is the most common method of graft reperfusion at liver transplantation (LT), contemporaneous portal and arterial revascularization (CPAr) was used to reduce arterial ischemia to the bile ducts. Aim of this pilot study is to prospectively compare SPAr (group 1 #38) versus CPAr (group 2 #42) in 80 consecutive LTs. Biliary anastomosis was always duct to duct [T-tube in 21 % of cases (p = 0.83) in both groups]. CPAr had longer warm ischemia 61 ± 10 versus 39 ± 13 min, p < 0.0001, while SPAr had longer arterial ischemia 96 ± 39 min (p = 0.0001). No PNF while DGF was encountered in 10 versus 5 % (p = 0.32). One-year graft and patient's survival were respectively 87 versus 93 % and 83 versus 88 % in groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.31 and p = 0.39). At a median follow-up of 19 ± 8 versus 17 ± 8 months (p = 0.24), biliary complications were 28 %, being 39 % in group 1 and 19 % in group 2 (p = 0.04). Anastomotic stenoses were present in 11 versus 12 % (p = 0.84), biliary leakage in 5 versus 5 % (p = 0.72) and intrahepatic non-anastomotic biliary strictures in 23 versus 0 % (p = 0.0008) in groups 1 and 2. CPAr is safe and feasible and reduces the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia to the intrahepatic bile ducts.

摘要

序贯门静脉和动脉再灌注(SPAr)是肝移植(LT)中最常见的移植物再灌注方法,同期门静脉和动脉再灌注(CPAr)用于减少胆管的动脉缺血。本前瞻性研究的目的是比较 80 例连续 LT 中 SPAr(组 1 #38)与 CPAr(组 2 #42)的效果。胆管吻合术始终为胆管对胆管[两组中 T 管的比例分别为 21%(p = 0.83)]。CPAr 的热缺血时间更长,为 61 ± 10 分钟,而 SPAr 为 96 ± 39 分钟(p < 0.0001)。SPAr 的动脉缺血时间更长,为 96 ± 39 分钟(p = 0.0001)。无 PNF 而 DGF 在 10 例和 5 例中发生(p = 0.32)。组 1 和组 2 的 1 年移植物和患者存活率分别为 87%和 93%,83%和 88%(p = 0.31 和 p = 0.39)。在中位随访 19 ± 8 个月和 17 ± 8 个月(p = 0.24)时,胆管并发症分别为 28%,组 1 为 39%,组 2 为 19%(p = 0.04)。吻合口狭窄分别为 11%和 12%(p = 0.84),胆漏分别为 5%和 5%(p = 0.72),肝内非吻合性胆管狭窄分别为 23%和 0%(p = 0.0008)。CPAr 是安全可行的,通过减少肝内胆管的动脉缺血时间,降低了肝内胆管狭窄的发生率。

相似文献

1
Protection of the intrahepatic biliary tree by contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion: results of a prospective randomized pilot study.同期门静脉和动脉再灌注对肝内胆管树的保护:前瞻性随机初步研究结果。
Updates Surg. 2012 Sep;64(3):173-7. doi: 10.1007/s13304-012-0164-1. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
2
Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation.肝移植期间门静脉与动脉序贯再灌注和同期再灌注的比较
Transplant Proc. 2011 May;43(4):1107-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.123.
3
Contemporaneous Portal-Arterial Reperfusion during Liver Transplantation: Preliminary Results.肝移植术中同期门静脉-动脉再灌注:初步结果
J Transplant. 2011;2011:251656. doi: 10.1155/2011/251656. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
4
Type of donor aortic preservation solution and not cold ischemia time is a major determinant of biliary strictures after liver transplantation.供体主动脉保存液的类型而非冷缺血时间是肝移植术后胆管狭窄的主要决定因素。
Liver Transpl. 2001 Jun;7(6):540-5. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2001.24641.
5
The influence of a contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization protocol on biliary complications after liver transplantation.同期门静脉和肝动脉重建方案对肝移植术后胆道并发症的影响。
Surgery. 2014 Jan;155(1):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.056. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Anastomosis of the Common Hepatic Artery and Round Ligament as Portal Vein Arterialization for Hepatic Artery Occlusion After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.肝移植术后肝动脉闭塞行肝总动脉与圆韧带吻合作为门静脉动脉化:1例报告
Transplant Proc. 2020 Mar;52(2):641-643. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
Effects of warm ischemia time on biliary injury in rat liver transplantation.热缺血时间对大鼠肝移植胆道损伤的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov 21;18(43):6308-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i43.6308.
8
High hilar dissection: new technique to reduce biliary complication in living donor liver transplantation.高位肝门解剖:降低活体肝移植胆道并发症的新技术。
Liver Transpl. 2004 Sep;10(9):1158-62. doi: 10.1002/lt.20230.
9
Neither Isolated Hepatic Arterial Clamping nor Hepatic Arterial Ligation Induce Ischemic Type Biliary Lesions in Rats.单独的肝动脉夹闭或肝动脉结扎均不会在大鼠中诱发缺血性B型胆管病变。
Ann Transplant. 2016 Oct 21;21:649-659. doi: 10.12659/aot.898001.
10
Effects of Initial Hepatic Artery Followed by Portal Reperfusion Technique on Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Outcomes.初始肝动脉随后门静脉再灌注技术对脑死亡供体肝移植结局的影响。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2021 Jul;19(7):671-675. doi: 10.6002/ect.2020.0555. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Different Reperfusion Sequences in Liver Transplantation.肝移植中不同再灌注顺序的短期和长期结果
Ann Transplant. 2021 Feb 19;26:e926847. doi: 10.12659/AOT.926847.
2
Identifying the Superior Reperfusion Technique in Liver Transplantation: A Network Meta-Analysis.确定肝移植中的最佳再灌注技术:一项网状Meta分析
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Sep 18;2019:9034263. doi: 10.1155/2019/9034263. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The occurrence of postreperfusion syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation and its significance in terms of complications and short-term survival.原位肝移植中再灌注综合征的发生及其在并发症和短期生存方面的意义。
Ann Transplant. 2011 Apr-Jun;16(2):26-30. doi: 10.12659/aot.881861.
2
ASTS recommended practice guidelines for controlled donation after cardiac death organ procurement and transplantation.美国胸外科医师协会心脏死亡后器官获取与移植的可控捐赠推荐实践指南。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Sep;9(9):2004-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02739.x. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
3
Postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation for cirrhosis: outcome and predictors.
肝硬化患者肝移植术中的再灌注综合征:结局与预测因素
Liver Transpl. 2009 May;15(5):522-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.21730.
4
The impact of postreperfusion syndrome on short-term patient and liver allograft outcome in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.再灌注后综合征对接受原位肝移植患者的短期患者及肝移植预后的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2008 Apr;14(4):504-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.21381.
5
The sequence of revascularization in liver transplantation: it does make a difference.肝移植中血管重建的顺序:这确实有影响。
Liver Transpl. 2006 Nov;12(11):1566-70. doi: 10.1002/lt.20797.
6
Retrograde reperfusion via vena cava lowers the risk of initial nonfunction but increases the risk of ischemic-type biliary lesions in liver transplantation--a randomized clinical trial.经腔静脉逆行再灌注降低肝移植初始无功能风险,但增加缺血型胆管病变风险——一项随机临床试验
Transpl Int. 2006 Sep;19(9):738-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00347.x.
7
Hemodynamic profile and tissular oxygenation in orthotopic liver transplantation: Influence of hepatic artery or portal vein revascularization of the graft.原位肝移植中的血流动力学特征与组织氧合:移植肝肝动脉或门静脉血运重建的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2006 Nov;12(11):1607-14. doi: 10.1002/lt.20794.
8
Sequential and simultaneous revascularization in adult orthotopic piggyback liver transplantation.成人原位背驮式肝移植中的序贯和同步血管重建
Liver Transpl. 2005 Aug;11(8):934-40. doi: 10.1002/lt.20513.
9
Causes of postreperfusion syndrome in living or cadaveric donor liver transplantations.活体或尸体供肝肝移植中再灌注综合征的病因
Transplant Proc. 2003 Jun;35(4):1442-4. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00483-4.
10
Risk factors for and clinical course of non-anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation.肝移植术后非吻合口胆管狭窄的危险因素及临床病程
Am J Transplant. 2003 Jul;3(7):885-90. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00165.x.