Department of Psychology, Universityof Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA.
Psychol Serv. 2013 Feb;10(1):123-30. doi: 10.1037/a0029062. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
The present study investigated the use of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2 L (Lie) scale in the preemployment selection of police officers. In a prior article, Weiss, Davis, Rostow, and Kinsman (2003) found that high L scale scores are associated with a number of performance problems in law enforcement officers. These investigators recommended a L scale raw score cutoff of 8 when making hiring decisions. The present study sought to explore the usefulness of this recommendation by analyzing data from 4348 officers who had taken the MMPI-2 as a condition of preemployment and had follow-up data on performance provided by their supervisors. Results indicated that officers with L scale raw scores of 8 or higher had significantly more performance problems than those who had scores of 7 or below. Similar results were obtained when cut points of 7 and 9 were used. These results were robust insofar as they remained significant when other factors potentially related to the L scale, particularly level of education, ethnicity, and scores on the 10 MMPI-2 Clinical Scales, were controlled for in the analyses. Implications of these findings for police psychological evaluations are discussed.
本研究调查了明尼苏达多相人格测验(MMPI-2)L(谎言)量表在警察招聘中的应用。在之前的一篇文章中,Weiss、Davis、Rostow 和 Kinsman(2003)发现,高 L 量表分数与执法人员的许多绩效问题有关。这些研究人员建议在做出雇佣决策时,L 量表原始分数的截止值为 8。本研究通过分析 4348 名作为入职条件接受 MMPI-2 测试并由其主管提供绩效后续数据的警察的资料,旨在探讨这一建议的有用性。结果表明,L 量表原始分数为 8 或更高的警察比得分在 7 或以下的警察有更多的绩效问题。当使用 7 和 9 的截断点时,得到了类似的结果。这些结果是稳健的,因为当在分析中控制了可能与 L 量表相关的其他因素(特别是教育水平、种族和 MMPI-2 10 个临床量表的分数)时,它们仍然具有显著意义。讨论了这些发现对警察心理评估的影响。