Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Jun;18(6):313-9.
To assess the performance of a health information technology platform that enables automated measurement of asthma care quality using comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR) data, including providers' free-text notes.
Retrospective data study of outpatient asthma care in Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), a midsized health maintenance organization (HMO), and OCHIN, Inc, a group of Federally Qualified Health Centers.
We created 22 automated quality measures addressing guideline-recommended outpatient asthma care. We included EMRs of asthma patients aged >12 years during a 3-year observation window and narrowed this group to those with persistent asthma (13,918 KPNW; 1825 OCHIN). We validated our automated quality measures using chart review for 818 randomly selected patients, stratified by age and sex for each health system. In both health systems, we compared the performance of these measures against chart review.
Most measures performed well in the KPNW system, where accuracy averaged 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82%-93%). Mean sensitivity was 77% (95% CI 62%-92%) and mean specificity was 84% (95% CI 75%-93%). The automated analysis was less accurate at OCHIN, where mean accuracy was 80% (95% CI 72%-89%) with mean sensitivity and specificity 52% (95% CI 35%-69%) and 82% (95% CI 69%-95%) respectively.
To achieve comprehensive quality measurement in many clinical domains, the capacity to analyze text clinical notes is required. The automated measures performed well in the HMO, where practice is more standardized. The measures need to be refined for health systems with more diversity in clinical practice, patient populations, and setting.
评估一种健康信息技术平台的性能,该平台使用综合电子病历(EMR)数据(包括提供者的自由文本记录)实现哮喘护理质量的自动测量。
凯萨医疗机构西北分部(KPNW)和 OCHIN,Inc. 的门诊哮喘护理回顾性数据研究,前者是一家中等规模的健康维护组织(HMO),后者是一组联邦合格的健康中心。
我们创建了 22 项自动化质量指标,用于评估符合指南的门诊哮喘护理。我们纳入了 3 年观察期内年龄>12 岁的哮喘患者的 EMR,并将该组患者缩小至持续性哮喘患者(KPNW 13918 例;OCHIN 1825 例)。我们对这两个健康系统的 818 名随机选择的患者进行了图表审查,以验证我们的自动化质量指标。
在 KPNW 系统中,大多数指标的表现都很好,准确率平均为 88%(95%置信区间[CI]82%-93%)。平均敏感度为 77%(95%CI 62%-92%),平均特异性为 84%(95%CI 75%-93%)。在 OCHIN 中,自动化分析的准确性较低,平均准确率为 80%(95%CI 72%-89%),平均敏感度和特异性分别为 52%(95%CI 35%-69%)和 82%(95%CI 69%-95%)。
要在许多临床领域实现全面的质量测量,需要能够分析文本临床记录的能力。在实践更为标准化的 HMO 中,自动化指标表现良好。对于临床实践、患者群体和环境多样性较大的医疗系统,这些指标需要进一步改进。