Lozano Paula, Finkelstein Jonathan A, Carey Vincent J, Wagner Edward H, Inui Thomas S, Fuhlbrigge Anne L, Soumerai Stephen B, Sullivan Sean D, Weiss Scott T, Weiss Kevin B
Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Sep;158(9):875-83. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.9.875.
Traditional primary care practice change approaches have not led to full implementation of national asthma guidelines.
To evaluate the effectiveness of 2 asthma care improvement strategies in primary care.
Two-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
Forty-two primary care pediatric practices affiliated with 4 managed care organizations.
Children aged 3 to 17 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma enrolled in primary care practices affiliated with managed care organizations.
Peer leader education consisted of training 1 physician per practice in asthma guidelines and peer teaching methods. Planned care combined the peer leader program with nurse-mediated organizational change through planned visits with assessments, care planning, and self-management support, in collaboration with physicians. Analyses compared each intervention with usual care.
Annualized asthma symptom days, asthma-specific functional health status (Children's Health Survey for Asthma), and frequency of brief oral steroid courses (bursts).
Six hundred thirty-eight children completed baseline evaluations, representing 64% of those screened and eligible. Mean +/- SD age was 9.4 +/- 3.5 years; 60% were boys. Three hundred fifty (55%) were taking controller medication. Mean +/- SD annualized asthma symptom days was 107.4 +/- 122 days. Children in the peer leader arm had 6.5 fewer symptom days per year (95% confidence interval [CI], - 16.9 to 3.6), a nonsignificant difference, but had a 36% (95% CI, 11% to 54%) lower oral steroid burst rate per year compared with children receiving usual care. Children in the planned care arm had 13.3 (95% CI, - 24.7 to -2.1) fewer symptom days annually (-12% from baseline; P =.02) and a 39% (95% CI, 11% to 58%) lower oral steroid burst rate per year relative to usual care. Both interventions showed small, statistically significant effects for 2 of 5 Children's Health Survey for Asthma scales. Planned care subjects had greater controller adherence (parent report) compared with usual care subjects (rate ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.09]).
Planned care (nurse-mediated organizational change plus peer leader education) is an effective model for improving asthma care in the primary care setting. Peer leader education on its own may also serve as a useful model for improving asthma care, although it is less comprehensive and the treatment effect less pronounced.
传统的初级保健实践变革方法未能导致国家哮喘指南的全面实施。
评估两种哮喘护理改善策略在初级保健中的有效性。
为期两年的随机对照临床试验。
隶属于4个管理式医疗组织的42家初级保健儿科诊所。
年龄在3至17岁、患有轻度至中度持续性哮喘且在隶属于管理式医疗组织的初级保健诊所登记的儿童。
同行领导者教育包括为每家诊所培训1名医生掌握哮喘指南和同行教学方法。计划护理将同行领导者项目与护士介导的组织变革相结合,通过计划就诊进行评估、护理规划和自我管理支持,并与医生协作。分析将每种干预措施与常规护理进行比较。
年化哮喘症状天数、哮喘特异性功能健康状况(儿童哮喘健康调查)以及短期口服类固醇疗程(突击治疗)的频率。
638名儿童完成了基线评估,占筛查合格儿童的64%。平均年龄±标准差为9.4±3.5岁;60%为男孩。350名(55%)正在使用控制药物。年化哮喘症状天数的平均值±标准差为107.4±122天。同行领导者组的儿童每年症状天数减少6.5天(95%置信区间[CI],-16.9至3.6),差异无统计学意义,但与接受常规护理的儿童相比,每年口服类固醇突击治疗率降低36%(95%CI,11%至54%)。计划护理组的儿童每年症状天数减少13.3天(95%CI,-24.7至-2.1)(较基线减少12%;P=0.02),相对于常规护理,每年口服类固醇突击治疗率降低39%(95%CI,11%至58%)。两种干预措施在5项儿童哮喘健康调查量表中的2项上显示出小的、具有统计学意义的效果。与常规护理组相比,计划护理组的受试者控制药物依从性更高(家长报告)(率比,1.05[95%CI,1.00至1.09])。
计划护理(护士介导的组织变革加同行领导者教育)是改善初级保健环境中哮喘护理的有效模式。仅同行领导者教育本身也可能是改善哮喘护理的有用模式,尽管它不够全面且治疗效果不太显著。