Weisler Richard H, Kalali Amir H, Cutler Andrew J, Gazda Thomas D, Ginsberg Lawrence
Dr. Weisler is from Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Departments of Psychiatry, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2008 Mar;5(3):35-48.
To compare the efficacy and safety of carbamazepine extended-release capsules (CBZ-ERC) administered twice daily (BID) versus once daily for the treatment of manic symptoms associated with bipolar I disorder in adults.
This was a Phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, 12-week study. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to CBZ-ERC once daily at bedtime (QHS) or BID. Dosing was initiated at CBZ-ERC 200mg/d and titrated to achieve an optimal dose (target dose, 800mg/d; maximum dose, 1600mg/d). The primary efficacy outcome variable was the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 21-item version (HAM-D(21)), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), and time to remission were secondary outcome variables. Safety measures included recording of adverse events, physical examination, vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate, and weight), and clinical laboratory and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters.
BID and QHS dosing were equally effective in improving symptoms of bipolar disorder, as measured with the YMRS, HAM-D(21), MADRS, and CGI-BP. Both BID and QHS dosing significantly improved total scores on the YMRS, HAM-D(21), and MADRS at all time points without statistically significant differences between groups. All three components of the CGI-BP improved during the study, and a large percentage of subjects in both groups achieved remission without significant differences between groups. Both CBZ-ERC regimens appeared to be safe and well tolerated.
These results suggest QHS dosing may be a safe and effective alternative to BID dosing of CBZ-ERC for treating manic episodes for many adults with bipolar I disorder, although additional studies are needed to confirm this finding.
比较卡马西平缓释胶囊(CBZ - ERC)每日两次(BID)与每日一次给药治疗成人双相I型障碍相关躁狂症状的疗效和安全性。
这是一项IIIb期、随机、双盲、平行组、多中心、为期12周的研究。受试者被随机(1:1)分为睡前每日一次(QHS)服用CBZ - ERC或每日两次服用。起始剂量为CBZ - ERC 200mg/d,并进行滴定以达到最佳剂量(目标剂量,800mg/d;最大剂量,1600mg/d)。主要疗效结局变量为青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)。汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表21项版(HAM - D(21))、蒙哥马利 - 阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、临床总体印象量表双相版(CGI - BP)以及缓解时间为次要结局变量。安全措施包括记录不良事件、体格检查、生命体征(血压、脉搏率和体重)以及临床实验室和心电图(ECG)参数。
用YMRS、HAM - D(21)、MADRS和CGI - BP测量,每日两次和每日一次给药在改善双相情感障碍症状方面同样有效。每日两次和每日一次给药在所有时间点均显著改善YMRS、HAM - D(21)和MADRS的总分,组间无统计学显著差异。CGI - BP的所有三个组成部分在研究期间均有改善,两组中很大比例的受试者实现缓解,组间无显著差异。两种CBZ - ERC给药方案似乎均安全且耐受性良好。
这些结果表明,对于许多患有双相I型障碍的成人,每日一次给药可能是卡马西平缓释胶囊每日两次给药治疗躁狂发作的一种安全有效的替代方法,尽管需要更多研究来证实这一发现。