• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[多学科治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的疗效及预后因素]

[Therapeutic effects and prognostic factors for the limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated with multidisciplinary therapy].

作者信息

Dong Xiao-jiao, Wang Meng-zhao, Zhong Wei, Zhang Li, Zhang Xiao-tong, Zhao Jing, Xia Ying, Li Long-yun

机构信息

Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;34(3):216-21. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.03.013.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.03.013
PMID:22780978
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences of objective response rate (ORR), side effects and survival among patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, sequential chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, and to analyze the influencing factors on their survival.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-six patients diagnosed as LD-SCLC in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2000 to December 2009 were included in this study. The differences of objective response rates, side effects and survival rates were analyzed by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier test was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS). Cox regression was used to detect the influencing factors on survival time of the patients.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into three groups: concurrent chemoradiotherapy (49 cases), sequential chemoradiotherapy (62 cases) and chemotherapy alone (55 cases). The chemotherapy was based on CE/EP regimen, with an average cycle of 5.2. Radiotherapy was of a common or 3-dimensional conformal technology, for regular segmentation irradiation with an average dose of 49.6 Gy. The total ORR was 73.4%, OS and PFS were 22.9 months and 10.8 months, 1, 3, 5-year survival rates were 82.7%, 31.8%, 18.6%, respectively. For the concurrent group, sequential group and chemotherapy alone group, the ORR was 89.4%, 67.2% and 66.0%, respectively. Compared the chemotherapy alone group and concurrent group with the sequential group, there were significant differences (P<0.05). For the concurrent group, sequential group and chemotherapy alone group, the median OS was 29.7 months, 22.6 months, and 19.5 months; the median PFS was 12.7 months, 10.8 months, and 9.8 months, respectively, with a non-significant difference between each two groups (P>0.05). For the concurrent group, sequential group and chemotherapy alone group, the 1-year survival rates were 91.1%, 86.3%, and 65.6%, the 3-year survival rates were 44.2%, 28.3% and 22.8%, and the 5-year survival rates were 24.2%, 21.4% and 11.1%, respectively, with significant differences among them (P<0.05). The major side effects were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, radiation pneumonia and radiation esophagitis. For the concurrent group, sequential group and chemotherapy alone group, the incidence of myelosuppression were 84.4%, 76.8% and 60.0%, respectively, with a significant difference (P=0.008) between the concurrent group and chemotherapy alone group. For the concurrent group and sequential group, the incidences of radiation pneumonia were 22.2% and 22.9%, with a non-significant difference (P=0.940). The incidences of radiation esophagitis were 47.2% and 16.7%, respectively, with a significant difference (P=0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that OS was significantly associated with gender (P=0.018) and ECOG score (P=0.009), and PFS was significantly associated with gender (P=0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

For LD-SCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy can significantly increase the objective response rate. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone can extend survival, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy is better, but the differences among the three regimens are not significant. Gender and ECOG score are important influencing factors of survival.

摘要

目的

研究局限期小细胞肺癌(LD-SCLC)患者接受同步放化疗、序贯放化疗或单纯化疗时的客观缓解率(ORR)、副作用及生存率差异,并分析其生存的影响因素。

方法

纳入2000年1月至2009年12月在北京协和医院确诊为LD-SCLC的166例患者。采用χ2检验分析客观缓解率、副作用及生存率的差异。采用Kaplan-Meier检验计算总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用Cox回归检测患者生存时间的影响因素。

结果

患者分为三组:同步放化疗组(49例)、序贯放化疗组(62例)和单纯化疗组(55例)。化疗采用CE/EP方案,平均周期为5.2个周期。放疗采用常规或三维适形技术,进行常规分割照射,平均剂量为49.6 Gy。总ORR为73.4%,OS和PFS分别为22.9个月和10.8个月,1年、3年、5年生存率分别为82.7%、31.8%、18.6%。同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组和单纯化疗组的ORR分别为89.4%、67.2%和66.0%。单纯化疗组和同步放化疗组与序贯放化疗组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组和单纯化疗组的中位OS分别为29.7个月、22.6个月和19.5个月;中位PFS分别为12.7个月、10.8个月和9.8个月,两两比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组和单纯化疗组的1年生存率分别为91.1%、86.3%和65.6%,3年生存率分别为44.2%、28.3%和22.8%,5年生存率分别为24.2%、21.4%和11.1%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。主要副作用为骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应、放射性肺炎和放射性食管炎。同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组和单纯化疗组的骨髓抑制发生率分别为84.4%、76.8%和60.0%,同步放化疗组与单纯化疗组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.008)。同步放化疗组和序贯放化疗组的放射性肺炎发生率分别为22.2%和22.9%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.940)。放射性食管炎发生率分别为47.2%和16.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。多因素分析显示,OS与性别(P=0.018)和ECOG评分(P=0.009)显著相关,PFS与性别(P=0.050)显著相关。

结论

对于LD-SCLC,同步放化疗可显著提高客观缓解率。同步放化疗和序贯放化疗与单纯化疗相比可延长生存期,且同步放化疗更佳,但三种方案之间差异无统计学意义。性别和ECOG评分是生存的重要影响因素。

相似文献

1
[Therapeutic effects and prognostic factors for the limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated with multidisciplinary therapy].[多学科治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的疗效及预后因素]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;34(3):216-21. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.03.013.
2
[Effect of different chemotherapy regimens for concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer].不同化疗方案同步放化疗对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Feb;31(2):143-7.
3
[Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent three dimensional conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced non small cell lung cancer].[每周紫杉醇与卡铂同步三维适形放疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2007 Oct;29(10):769-72.
4
[Comparison of effectiveness and safety of different treatment modes for limited-stage small cell lung].局限期小细胞肺癌不同治疗模式的有效性与安全性比较
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2013 Jun;35(3):343-7. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2013.03.019.
5
Induction chemotherapy improved outcomes of patients with resectable esophageal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery.诱导化疗改善了接受放化疗后手术的可切除食管癌患者的预后。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Oct 1;60(2):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.033.
6
[Initial outcome of induction chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel followed by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and concurrent weekly paclitaxel for stage III non-small cell lung cancer].[III期非小细胞肺癌患者先行每周一次紫杉醇诱导化疗,随后进行三维适形放疗并同步每周一次紫杉醇治疗的初步结果]
Ai Zheng. 2006 Oct;25(10):1279-83.
7
Prognostic factors in limited-stage small cell lung cancer of patients treated with combined modality approach.采用综合治疗方法治疗的局限期小细胞肺癌患者的预后因素。
J BUON. 2006 Jan-Mar;11(1):31-7.
8
Factors associated with severe acute esophagitis from hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.局限期小细胞肺癌同步化疗超分割放疗所致严重急性食管炎的相关因素。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 15;74(4):1108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
9
[Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: comparison in 93 patients].[同步放化疗序贯巩固化疗与序贯放化疗治疗Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌:93例患者的比较]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012 Mar;32(3):362-7.
10
Predictors of acute esophagitis in lung cancer patients treated with concurrent three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and chemotherapy.同步三维适形放疗与化疗治疗肺癌患者急性食管炎的预测因素
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 1;73(3):810-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.064. Epub 2008 Aug 26.