• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用人权满足计划生育的未满足需求。

Use of human rights to meet the unmet need for family planning.

出版信息

Lancet. 2012 Jul 14;380(9837):172-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60732-6. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60732-6
PMID:22784536
Abstract

In this report, we describe how human rights can help to shape laws, policies, programmes, and projects in relation to contraceptive information and services. Applying a human rights perspective and recognising the International Conference on Population and Development and Millennium Development Goal commitments to universal access to reproductive health including family planning, we support measurement of unmet need for family planning that encompasses more groups than has been the case until recently. We outline how human rights can be used to identify, reduce, and eliminate barriers to accessing contraception; the ways in which human rights can enhance laws and policies; and governments' legal obligations in relation to contraceptive information and services. We underline the crucial importance of accountability of states and identify some of the priorities for making family planning available that are mandated by human rights.

摘要

在本报告中,我们描述了人权如何有助于制定与避孕信息和服务相关的法律、政策、方案和项目。我们采用人权视角,并承认国际人口与发展会议和千年发展目标做出的普及生殖健康包括计划生育的承诺,支持衡量计划生育未满足需求的方法,涵盖比最近更广泛的群体。我们概述了如何利用人权来确定、减少和消除获取避孕的障碍;人权如何增强法律和政策;以及政府在避孕信息和服务方面的法律义务。我们强调国家问责制的至关重要性,并确定了一些由人权授权的提供计划生育的优先事项。

相似文献

1
Use of human rights to meet the unmet need for family planning.利用人权满足计划生育的未满足需求。
Lancet. 2012 Jul 14;380(9837):172-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60732-6. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
2
International human rights and women's reproductive health.国际人权与妇女的生殖健康
Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-86.
3
The high cost of merging with a religiously-controlled hospital.与宗教控制的医院合并的高昂成本。
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 2003 Mar(287):9-25.
4
Contraception. Family planning: by whom and for whom?避孕。计划生育:由谁来做,为谁而做?
Newsl Womens Glob Netw Reprod Rights. 1992 Jan-Mar(38):17-21.
5
Human rights advances in women's reproductive health in Africa.非洲妇女生殖健康领域的人权进步。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 May;129(2):184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
6
Choice, access, information are among clients' rights.选择权、获取权、知情权均属于客户的权利。
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1993 Aug;14(1):24-6.
7
Legal and ethical standards for protecting women's human rights and the practice of conscientious objection in reproductive healthcare settings.保护妇女人权的法律和伦理标准及在生殖保健环境中践行谨慎拒绝医疗的实践。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;123 Suppl 3:S63-5. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60005-3.
8
Human rights and reproductive choice.人权与生殖选择。
Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Jan-Feb;24(1):18-30.
9
If only policy analysis were so easy.要是政策分析能这么简单就好了。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2013 Autumn;32(4):897-9. doi: 10.1002/pam.21714.
10
[Family planning in Sweden during 100 years. Abortion and contraceptive agents--from law-breaking to reproductive right].[瑞典百年计划生育。堕胎与避孕药物——从违法到生殖权利]
Lakartidningen. 2004 Jan 8;101(1-2):88-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Revising the definition of "demand satisfied for modern methods of family planning:" A cross-sectional study to explore incorporating person-centered constructs of demand, choice, and satisfaction.修订“现代计划生育方法需求满足”的定义:一项探索纳入以人为主的需求、选择和满意度概念的横断面研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 6;20(1):e0316725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316725. eCollection 2025.
2
Intrauterine Device Use and Perceptions Among Women in Tanzania-A Mixed Methods Study.坦桑尼亚女性对宫内节育器的使用及认知——一项混合方法研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Dec 19;10:23779608241305782. doi: 10.1177/23779608241305782. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
A particular epidemiological profile: disparities in access to contraceptive methods in Brazil during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.
一个特殊的流行病学特征:在 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)大流行期间,巴西在获得避孕方法方面的差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 1;14(1):14982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65946-w.
4
Supply-Side Versus Demand-Side Unmet Need: Implications for Family Planning Programs.供给侧与需求侧未满足的需求:对计划生育项目的影响。
Popul Dev Rev. 2022 Sep;48(3):689-722. doi: 10.1111/padr.12478. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
Immigrant women's perspectives on contraceptive counselling provided by midwives in Sweden - a qualitative study.移民妇女对瑞典助产士提供的避孕咨询的看法——一项定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2111796. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2111796.
6
Using experience to create evidence: a mixed methods process evaluation of the new free family planning policy in Burkina Faso.利用经验创造证据:布基纳法索新计划生育免费政策的混合方法过程评估。
Reprod Health. 2022 Mar 18;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01375-0.
7
Experiences of Accessing and Providing Contraceptive Implant Removal Services in Gaborone, Botswana: A Qualitative Study Among Implant Users and Healthcare Providers.博茨瓦纳哈博罗内获取和提供避孕植入物取出服务的经历:一项针对植入物使用者和医疗服务提供者的定性研究
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Jun 25;2:684694. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.684694. eCollection 2021.
8
Contraceptive trajectories postpartum: A longitudinal qualitative study of women living with HIV in Cape Town, South Africa.产后避孕轨迹:南非开普敦艾滋病毒感染者的纵向定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114555. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114555. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
9
Family planning for women with severe mental illness in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study.农村埃塞俄比亚严重精神疾病妇女的计划生育:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 28;18(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01245-1.
10
Advancing Rights-Based Family Planning from 2020 to 2030.2020年至2030年推进基于权利的计划生育
Open Access J Contracept. 2021 Sep 9;12:157-171. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S324678. eCollection 2021.