Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy.
Clin Nucl Med. 2012 Aug;37(8):e184-8. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825b2583.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of 18F-FDG PET/CT in suspected recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer, after treatment, comparing outcomes of PET/CT with histological tumor subtype, CA-125 serum levels, and findings of conventional diagnostic imaging modalities (CI).
Data from 121 women who underwent FDG PET/CT for suspected recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer after treatment were reviewed retrospectively.
Of all patients, 80% had recurrent disease and 20% were disease-free on the final clinical diagnosis. PET/CT showed true-positive findings in 82% of patients, whereas CI demonstrated true-positives in 70% of cases. At the time of PET/CT scanning, only 55 patients had serum CA-125 level greater than 35 U/mL, whereas 52 patients presented with CA-125 levels in a reference range. PET/CT sensitivity (82%) was significantly higher than that of CA-125 (59%), whereas difference in sensitivity between PET/CT and CI (69%) was limited. PET/CT specificity (87%) was significantly better than that of CI (47%), although no difference in specificity between PET/CT and CA-125 (80%) was found. However, no difference in CA-125 serum levels between patients with local tumor relapse and those with distant metastases was found. PET/CT showed the highest positive predictive value (96%) and negative predictive value (55%) when compared with other modalities. In high-grade tumors (n = 66), PET/CT accuracy was 80%, better than that of serum CA-125 (64%) and that of CI (62%). Equally in low-grade ovarian carcinomas (n = 55), PET/CT accuracy (87%) was significantly higher than that of the tumor marker (60%) and also higher than that of CI (70%).
FDG PET/CT was proven to be more efficient than serum CA-125 assay and CI in detecting recurrences of ovarian cancer after treatment. The sensitivity of FDG PET/CT is not influenced by tumor histology. FDG PET/CT should be considered a useful diagnostic tool in the surveillance of patients that received treatment for epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
本研究旨在评估 18F-FDG PET/CT 在治疗后疑似上皮性卵巢癌复发中的应用效能,并将其与肿瘤组织学亚型、CA-125 血清水平以及常规诊断影像学(CI)的结果进行比较。
回顾性分析了 121 例行 FDG PET/CT 检查以评估上皮性卵巢癌治疗后疑似复发的患者。
所有患者中,80%的患者存在疾病复发,20%的患者经最终临床诊断为无疾病状态。PET/CT 在 82%的患者中显示出真正的阳性发现,而 CI 在 70%的病例中显示出真正的阳性。在进行 PET/CT 扫描时,仅有 55 例患者的血清 CA-125 水平大于 35 U/mL,而 52 例患者的 CA-125 水平在参考范围内。PET/CT 的灵敏度(82%)显著高于 CA-125(59%),而 PET/CT 与 CI 之间的灵敏度差异(69%)有限。PET/CT 的特异性(87%)显著优于 CI(47%),尽管 PET/CT 与 CA-125 的特异性(80%)之间没有差异。然而,在局部肿瘤复发患者和远处转移患者之间,并未发现血清 CA-125 水平存在差异。与其他检测方式相比,PET/CT 具有最高的阳性预测值(96%)和阴性预测值(55%)。在高级别肿瘤(n=66)中,PET/CT 的准确率为 80%,优于 CA-125(64%)和 CI(62%)。同样,在低级别卵巢癌(n=55)中,PET/CT 的准确率(87%)显著高于肿瘤标志物(60%),也高于 CI(70%)。
与 CA-125 检测和 CI 相比,FDG PET/CT 在治疗后卵巢癌复发的检测中更为有效。FDG PET/CT 的灵敏度不受肿瘤组织学的影响。FDG PET/CT 应被视为上皮性卵巢癌治疗后患者监测的有用诊断工具。