Holmlund Anders, Lund Bodil, Weiner Carina Krüger
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet/Karolinska University Hospital, Box 4064, S 141 04 Huddinge, Sweden.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;51(3):206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
Twenty-two patients with chronic arthritis and ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) were treated by resection of the condyle with osteoarthrectomy and interposition with a temporalis muscle flap. We compared them with 14 patients who were treated by condylectomy and osteoarthrectomy alone. All patients were evaluated prospectively. Most patients had had a previous operation on the disc. Variables investigated before and after operation were pain during mandibular movements (using a visual analogue score (VAS) of 1-10) and impaired mandibular function such as chewing and biting off (also using a VAS of 1-10). Maximum interincisal opening was measured with a ruler. Both groups of patients showed significant improvements in all the variables evaluated. Using the predefined success criteria, both methods showed good success rates with few complications. The patients treated by interposition of the temporalis muscle tended to do better, but not significantly so. Both methods induced occlusal changes and some needed dental treatment postoperatively.
22例颞下颌关节(TMJ)慢性关节炎伴关节强直患者接受了髁突切除术、骨关节炎切除术并用颞肌瓣进行间置治疗。我们将他们与14例仅接受髁突切除术和骨关节炎切除术的患者进行了比较。所有患者均进行了前瞻性评估。大多数患者此前曾接受过盘手术。术前和术后调查的变量包括下颌运动时的疼痛(使用1 - 10的视觉模拟评分(VAS))以及咀嚼和咬断等下颌功能受损情况(同样使用1 - 10的VAS)。用直尺测量最大切牙间开口度。两组患者在所有评估变量上均有显著改善。使用预先定义的成功标准,两种方法均显示出良好的成功率且并发症较少。采用颞肌间置治疗的患者往往效果更好,但差异不显著。两种方法均导致咬合改变,部分患者术后需要牙科治疗。