Ejiri Soichi, Kikuchi Shin-ichi, Maruya Masato, Sekiguchi Yasufumi, Kawakami Ryoichi, Konno Shin-ichi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan.
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2012;58(1):49-59. doi: 10.5387/fms.58.49.
The surgical techniques widely used in Japan for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are the Okutsu method of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and palmar incision for open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). However, no prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared treatment outcomes between these two procedures. This RCT compared short-term outcomes between ECTR and OCTR for CTS.
Subjects were 101 hands (79 patients) treated in the department. ECTR was performed on 51 hands (40 patients), and OCTR was performed on 50 hands (39 patients). For assessment items, the following patient-based outcomes were evaluated: 1) changes in subjective symptoms; and 2) impairment in activities of daily living. The following items were also evaluated by physicians: 3) abductor pollicis brevis-distal latency (APB-DL); 4) sensation; and 5) muscle strength. All these assessments were made in postoperative weeks 4 and 12.
Recovery of muscle strength at postoperative week 4 was significantly better with ECTR (p< 0.05), but no significant differences were identified between groups in any of the other items. The ECTR group showed transient postoperative exacerbation of subjective symptoms in two hands (4%) and of APB-DL in three hands (6%). Comparison of hands with improved and exacerbated postoperative APB-DL in the ECTR group revealed significantly greater preoperative electrophysiological severity in exacerbated hands (p< 0.05). The cause of postoperative exacerbation with ECTR was considered to be transient nerve dysfunction resulting from the unique aspects of the ECTR procedure.
Compared with OCTR, ECTR offers superior recovery of muscle strength in the early postoperative period. At the same time, ECTR may carry a risk of transient nerve dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Caution must therefore be exercised when using ECTR for patients with severe electrophysiological findings.
在日本,用于特发性腕管综合征(CTS)的手术技术主要是Okutsu内镜下腕管松解术(ECTR)和开放性腕管松解术(OCTR)的掌侧切口。然而,尚无前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)比较这两种手术的治疗效果。本RCT比较了ECTR和OCTR治疗CTS的短期疗效。
研究对象为该科室治疗的101只手(79例患者)。51只手(40例患者)接受了ECTR,50只手(39例患者)接受了OCTR。评估项目包括:1)主观症状的变化;2)日常生活活动能力的损害。医生还评估了以下项目:3)拇短展肌-远端潜伏期(APB-DL);4)感觉;5)肌力。所有这些评估均在术后第4周和第12周进行。
ECTR术后第4周肌力恢复明显更好(p<0.05),但在其他项目上两组之间未发现显著差异。ECTR组有2只手(4%)出现术后主观症状短暂加重,3只手(6%)出现APB-DL短暂加重。比较ECTR组术后APB-DL改善和加重的手,发现加重的手术前电生理严重程度明显更高(p<0.05)。ECTR术后加重的原因被认为是ECTR手术独特之处导致的短暂神经功能障碍。
与OCTR相比,ECTR术后早期肌力恢复更佳。同时,ECTR在术后早期可能存在短暂神经功能障碍的风险。因此,对于电生理检查结果严重的患者使用ECTR时必须谨慎。